PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 11.72%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.86%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.40 which suggests that it could grow by 8.84%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.957% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.381, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.888%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.44x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 17.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.70x versus 2.22x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 10.24%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.86%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $149.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.4%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.957% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.381%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.44x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.70x versus 1.97x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Philip Morris International has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 28.92%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Philip Morris International's return on equity of --.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.86%. On the other hand Philip Morris International has an analysts' consensus of $178.09 which suggests that it could fall by -3.39%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.957% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.38%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Philip Morris International offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Philip Morris International pays out 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Philip Morris International quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.44x while Philip Morris International's PE ratio is 38.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.70x versus 7.47x for Philip Morris International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 2.71%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Walmart's return on equity of 20.37%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $172.88, signalling upside risk potential of 7.86%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $108.9505 which suggests that it could grow by 15.37%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.430, which suggesting that the stock is 56.957% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.043%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.54%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $165.6B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is lower than Walmart's net income of $4.5B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.44x while Walmart's PE ratio is 40.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.70x versus 1.11x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.