PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 14.94%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.78, signalling upside risk potential of 6.43%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.45 which suggests that it could grow by 8.5%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.18%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are larger than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.91x versus 3.68x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 19.01%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.78, signalling upside risk potential of 6.43%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $74.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.92%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.943%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.91x versus 6.35x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 5.48%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 50.31%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.78, signalling upside risk potential of 6.43%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $163.91 which suggests that it could grow by 10.31%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.519, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.125%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $27.8B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.91x versus 2.23x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 21.16% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 2.91%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56% beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.04%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $178.78, signalling upside risk potential of 6.43%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $108.2908 which suggests that it could grow by 26.88%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, which suggesting that the stock is 59.218% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.534, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.583%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.4%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $21.9B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $180.6B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B is lower than Walmart's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.75x while Walmart's PE ratio is 35.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.91x versus 1.01x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.