PG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 11.72%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 201.79%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $171.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $142.94 which suggests that it could grow by 7.66%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.356, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.407%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $567M. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.67x versus 2.26x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 29.92%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $171.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.48 which suggests that it could grow by 8.03%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.67x versus 6.60x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 10.24%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $171.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.92%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are larger than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.67x versus 1.97x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 19.06% compared to Procter & Gamble's net margin of 2.91%. Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14% beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.04%.

Procter & Gamble has a consensus price target of $171.51, signalling upside risk potential of 7.7%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $107.0085 which suggests that it could grow by 8.58%. Given that Walmart has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Walmart is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, which suggesting that the stock is 58.603% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.699, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.148%.

Procter & Gamble has a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.56%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Procter & Gamble pays 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 34.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues are $19.8B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $180.6B. Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B is lower than Walmart's net income of $5.3B. Notably, Procter & Gamble's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.28x while Walmart's PE ratio is 40.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Procter & Gamble is 4.67x versus 1.17x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.