KMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of -4.97%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 13.41%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $145.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of $106.87 which suggests that it could grow by 0.38%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.585, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.533%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 35.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of -$75.1M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 47.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.13x versus 4.33x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 14.64%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 434.96%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $145.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $101.01 which suggests that it could grow by 13.89%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.437, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.297%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 76.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $5B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $737M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.13x versus 3.64x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 5.62%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat Clorox's return on equity of 135.23%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $145.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.09 which suggests that it could grow by 2.38%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Clorox.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.421, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.895%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than Clorox's net income of $99M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Clorox's PE ratio is 55.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.13x versus 2.67x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 18.32% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 0.17%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 224.09% beat The Honest's return on equity of -3.3%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $145.20, signalling upside risk potential of 14.65%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.29 which suggests that it could grow by 13.84%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than The Honest, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than The Honest.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.411, which suggesting that the stock is 58.95% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.85%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 90.02% of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $5B, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.2M. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $907M is higher than The Honest's net income of $165K. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.13x versus 1.72x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.