KMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 14.94%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $143.84, signalling upside risk potential of 3.3%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.45 which suggests that it could grow by 8.5%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.18%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus 3.68x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 11.45%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat Clorox's return on equity of 174.43%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $143.84, signalling upside risk potential of 3.3%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.66 which suggests that it could grow by 11.89%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.696%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is higher than Clorox's net income of $193M. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while Clorox's PE ratio is 40.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus 2.56x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of -0.81%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat The Honest's return on equity of -4.47%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $143.84, signalling upside risk potential of 3.3%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.42 which suggests that it could grow by 45.71%. Given that The Honest has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe The Honest is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.8M. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is higher than The Honest's net income of -$810K. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus 1.36x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 9.07% compared to Kimberly-Clark's net margin of 21.16%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Kimberly-Clark has a consensus price target of $143.84, signalling upside risk potential of 3.3%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.78 which suggests that it could grow by 6.43%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, which suggesting that the stock is 63.505% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.218%.

Kimberly-Clark has a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.52%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Kimberly-Clark pays 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Kimberly-Clark's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.50x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kimberly-Clark is 2.35x versus 4.91x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.