CLX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Church & Dwight has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 11.96%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Church & Dwight's return on equity of 14.06%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.66, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Church & Dwight has an analysts' consensus of $106.66 which suggests that it could fall by -2.83%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.569, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.12%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Church & Dwight offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight pays out 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Church & Dwight quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Clorox's net income of $193M is higher than Church & Dwight's net income of $189.2M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while Church & Dwight's PE ratio is 46.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.56x versus 4.43x for Church & Dwight. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 14.94%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.66, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.23 which suggests that it could grow by 7.41%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.18%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.56x versus 3.71x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Estee Lauder Companies has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of -14.74%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat The Estee Lauder Companies's return on equity of -12.63%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.66, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand The Estee Lauder Companies has an analysts' consensus of $76.48 which suggests that it could grow by 17.92%. Given that The Estee Lauder Companies has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe The Estee Lauder Companies is more attractive than Clorox.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.679%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. The Estee Lauder Companies offers a yield of 3.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. The Estee Lauder Companies pays out 242.82% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than The Estee Lauder Companies quarterly revenues of $4B. Clorox's net income of $193M is higher than The Estee Lauder Companies's net income of -$590M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while The Estee Lauder Companies's PE ratio is 124.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.56x versus 1.54x for The Estee Lauder Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tyson Foods has a net margin of 11.45% compared to Clorox's net margin of 2.64%. Clorox's return on equity of 174.43% beat Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73%.

Clorox has a consensus price target of $164.66, signalling upside risk potential of 12.05%. On the other hand Tyson Foods has an analysts' consensus of $67.24 which suggests that it could grow by 11.81%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Tyson Foods, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Tyson Foods.

Clorox has a beta of 0.453, which suggesting that the stock is 54.696% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.013%.

Clorox has a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.31%. Tyson Foods offers a yield of 3.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Clorox pays 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods pays out 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Clorox quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Tyson Foods quarterly revenues of $13.6B. Clorox's net income of $193M is lower than Tyson Foods's net income of $359M. Notably, Clorox's price-to-earnings ratio is 40.15x while Tyson Foods's PE ratio is 20.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clorox is 2.56x versus 0.40x for Tyson Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.