CL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 9.07%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.23, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $143.84 which suggests that it could grow by 2.94%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.505%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M is higher than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.72x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.71x versus 2.35x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Naples Soap has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of --. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55% beat Naples Soap's return on equity of --.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.23, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Naples Soap has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Naples Soap, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Naples Soap.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Naples Soap has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Naples Soap offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Naples Soap pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Naples Soap quarterly revenues of --. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M is higher than Naples Soap's net income of --. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.72x while Naples Soap's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.71x versus -- for Naples Soap. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 21.16%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.23, signalling upside risk potential of 7.41%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.62 which suggests that it could grow by 5.95%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, which suggesting that the stock is 60.18% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.218%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.72x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.71x versus 4.93x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.