CL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 11.45%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55% beat Clorox's return on equity of 174.43%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 4.3%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $163.74 which suggests that it could grow by 11.2%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.612, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.802%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M is higher than Clorox's net income of $193M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.62x while Clorox's PE ratio is 40.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.84x versus 2.56x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 9.07%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 4.3%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $144.73 which suggests that it could grow by 1.77%. Given that Colgate-Palmolive has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Colgate-Palmolive is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.376, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.423%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M is higher than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.62x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.84x versus 2.39x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 21.16%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 4.3%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.47 which suggests that it could grow by 4.72%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.426, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.448%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.62x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 27.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.84x versus 4.98x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 14.94% compared to Colgate-Palmolive's net margin of 3.36%. Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a consensus price target of $97.73, signalling upside risk potential of 4.3%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $100.25 which suggests that it could grow by 40.11%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.402, which suggesting that the stock is 59.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.030, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.002%.

Colgate-Palmolive has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.14%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Colgate-Palmolive pays 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues are $4.9B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $700.2M. Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $23.5M. Notably, Colgate-Palmolive's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.62x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 17.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Colgate-Palmolive is 3.84x versus 0.70x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.