CENT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Colgate-Palmolive has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Central Garden & Pet's net margin of 14.94%. Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 7.96% beat Colgate-Palmolive's return on equity of 420.55%.

Central Garden & Pet has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.44%. On the other hand Colgate-Palmolive has an analysts' consensus of $97.23 which suggests that it could grow by 7.41%. Given that Central Garden & Pet has higher upside potential than Colgate-Palmolive, analysts believe Central Garden & Pet is more attractive than Colgate-Palmolive.

Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Colgate-Palmolive has a beta of 0.398, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.18%.

Central Garden & Pet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Colgate-Palmolive offers a yield of 2.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Central Garden & Pet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive pays out 61.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Colgate-Palmolive's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Garden & Pet quarterly revenues are $656.4M, which are smaller than Colgate-Palmolive quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Central Garden & Pet's net income of $14M is lower than Colgate-Palmolive's net income of $739M. Notably, Central Garden & Pet's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while Colgate-Palmolive's PE ratio is 25.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet is 0.74x versus 3.71x for Colgate-Palmolive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Clorox has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Central Garden & Pet's net margin of 11.45%. Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 7.96% beat Clorox's return on equity of 174.43%.

Central Garden & Pet has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.44%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.66 which suggests that it could grow by 12.05%. Given that Central Garden & Pet has higher upside potential than Clorox, analysts believe Central Garden & Pet is more attractive than Clorox.

Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.696%.

Central Garden & Pet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Central Garden & Pet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend.

Central Garden & Pet quarterly revenues are $656.4M, which are smaller than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Central Garden & Pet's net income of $14M is lower than Clorox's net income of $193M. Notably, Central Garden & Pet's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while Clorox's PE ratio is 40.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet is 0.74x versus 2.56x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Honest has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Central Garden & Pet's net margin of -0.81%. Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 7.96% beat The Honest's return on equity of -4.47%.

Central Garden & Pet has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.44%. On the other hand The Honest has an analysts' consensus of $7.42 which suggests that it could grow by 53.24%. Given that The Honest has higher upside potential than Central Garden & Pet, analysts believe The Honest is more attractive than Central Garden & Pet.

Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Honest has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Central Garden & Pet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Honest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Central Garden & Pet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Honest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Central Garden & Pet quarterly revenues are $656.4M, which are larger than The Honest quarterly revenues of $99.8M. Central Garden & Pet's net income of $14M is higher than The Honest's net income of -$810K. Notably, Central Garden & Pet's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while The Honest's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet is 0.74x versus 1.29x for The Honest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 2.13% compared to Central Garden & Pet's net margin of 9.07%. Central Garden & Pet's return on equity of 7.96% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

Central Garden & Pet has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 19.44%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $143.84 which suggests that it could grow by 2.94%. Given that Central Garden & Pet has higher upside potential than Kimberly-Clark, analysts believe Central Garden & Pet is more attractive than Kimberly-Clark.

Central Garden & Pet has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.366% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.505%.

Central Garden & Pet has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Central Garden & Pet pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Central Garden & Pet quarterly revenues are $656.4M, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Central Garden & Pet's net income of $14M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, Central Garden & Pet's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.89x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Central Garden & Pet is 0.74x versus 2.35x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.