CHD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Clorox has a net margin of 11.96% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 11.45%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 14.06% beat Clorox's return on equity of 174.43%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $106.66, signalling downside risk potential of -2.83%. On the other hand Clorox has an analysts' consensus of $164.66 which suggests that it could grow by 12.05%. Given that Clorox has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Clorox is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Clorox has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.696%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Clorox offers a yield of 3.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.22 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Clorox pays out 212.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Church & Dwight's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Clorox's is not.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Clorox quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Church & Dwight's net income of $189.2M is lower than Clorox's net income of $193M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.31x while Clorox's PE ratio is 40.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 4.43x versus 2.56x for Clorox. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.96% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 9.07%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 14.06% beat Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 213.79%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $106.66, signalling downside risk potential of -2.83%. On the other hand Kimberly-Clark has an analysts' consensus of $143.84 which suggests that it could grow by 2.94%. Given that Kimberly-Clark has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Kimberly-Clark is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.365, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.505%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Kimberly-Clark offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.26 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Kimberly-Clark pays out 63.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Kimberly-Clark quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Church & Dwight's net income of $189.2M is lower than Kimberly-Clark's net income of $447M. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.31x while Kimberly-Clark's PE ratio is 18.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 4.43x versus 2.35x for Kimberly-Clark. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 11.96% compared to Church & Dwight's net margin of 21.16%. Church & Dwight's return on equity of 14.06% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.56%.

Church & Dwight has a consensus price target of $106.66, signalling downside risk potential of -2.83%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $178.62 which suggests that it could grow by 5.95%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Church & Dwight, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Church & Dwight.

Church & Dwight has a beta of 0.569, which suggesting that the stock is 43.12% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.408, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.218%.

Church & Dwight has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.04%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. Church & Dwight pays 47.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Church & Dwight quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $21.9B. Church & Dwight's net income of $189.2M is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Church & Dwight's price-to-earnings ratio is 46.31x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Church & Dwight is 4.43x versus 4.93x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.