TSN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Freshpet has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 6.9%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat Freshpet's return on equity of 4.69%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.24, signalling upside risk potential of 12.07%. On the other hand Freshpet has an analysts' consensus of $148.18 which suggests that it could grow by 71.3%. Given that Freshpet has higher upside potential than Tyson Foods, analysts believe Freshpet is more attractive than Tyson Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshpet has a beta of 1.577, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.681%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Freshpet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Freshpet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than Freshpet quarterly revenues of $262.7M. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than Freshpet's net income of $18.1M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Freshpet's PE ratio is 92.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.40x versus 4.42x for Freshpet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hormel Foods has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 5.71%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat Hormel Foods's return on equity of 9.54%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.24, signalling upside risk potential of 12.07%. On the other hand Hormel Foods has an analysts' consensus of $31.43 which suggests that it could grow by 6.59%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Hormel Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Hormel Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hormel Foods has a beta of 0.214, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.631%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Hormel Foods offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Hormel Foods pays out 76.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than Hormel Foods quarterly revenues of $3B. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than Hormel Foods's net income of $170.6M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Hormel Foods's PE ratio is 21.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.40x versus 1.36x for Hormel Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pilgrims Pride has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of 5.4%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat Pilgrims Pride's return on equity of 28.51%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.24, signalling upside risk potential of 12.07%. On the other hand Pilgrims Pride has an analysts' consensus of $49.14 which suggests that it could fall by -2.24%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than Pilgrims Pride, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than Pilgrims Pride.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilgrims Pride has a beta of 0.713, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.678%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. Pilgrims Pride offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilgrims Pride pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than Pilgrims Pride quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than Pilgrims Pride's net income of $235.9M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while Pilgrims Pride's PE ratio is 11.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.40x versus 0.67x for Pilgrims Pride. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 2.64% compared to Tyson Foods's net margin of -0.04%. Tyson Foods's return on equity of 5.73% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Tyson Foods has a consensus price target of $67.24, signalling upside risk potential of 12.07%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $29.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.99%. Given that Tyson Foods has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Tyson Foods is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

Tyson Foods has a beta of 0.720, which suggesting that the stock is 28.013% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.177%.

Tyson Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.3%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tyson Foods pays 85.5% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tyson Foods's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tyson Foods quarterly revenues are $13.6B, which are larger than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Tyson Foods's net income of $359M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Tyson Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.27x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tyson Foods is 0.40x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.