UNFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 2.32%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 11.64%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $29.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $69.75 which suggests that it could grow by 32.96%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.801%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $1B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $23.9M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 40.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.61x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 0.05%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 3.29%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $29.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.54%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $711.3M. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than Amcon Distributing's net income of $348.4K. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 21.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 2.02%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat Sysco's return on equity of 90.07%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $29.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $83.68 which suggests that it could grow by 14.2%. Given that Sysco has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Sysco is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.656%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $20.2B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than Sysco's net income of $406M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sysco's PE ratio is 18.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.45x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of -0.04% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 0.7%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 10.41%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of $29.78, signalling upside risk potential of 11.4%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $80.26 which suggests that it could grow by 22.56%. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.558, which suggesting that the stock is 44.177% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.13%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $8.2B, which are smaller than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.5B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $66M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 32.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.42x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.