UNFI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of -0.27% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 1.51%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 10.43%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.09%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $55.38 which suggests that it could grow by 10.77%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.291, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.105%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $931.5M. United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $14.1M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 43.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.66x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of -0.27% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 0.17%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.09%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.554%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M is lower than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 18.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Food Holdings has a net margin of -0.27% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 7.85%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64% beat Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 22.76%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.09%. On the other hand Innovative Food Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of 0.198, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.202%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Innovative Food Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Food Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues of $17M. United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M is lower than Innovative Food Holdings's net income of $1.3M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Innovative Food Holdings's PE ratio is 76.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 1.44x for Innovative Food Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SpartanNash has a net margin of -0.27% compared to United Natural Foods's net margin of 0.49%. United Natural Foods's return on equity of -5.64% beat SpartanNash's return on equity of 5.86%.

United Natural Foods has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 0.09%. On the other hand SpartanNash has an analysts' consensus of $23.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.42%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.633, which suggesting that the stock is 36.747% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SpartanNash has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.043%.

United Natural Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SpartanNash offers a yield of 4.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. United Natural Foods pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash pays out 56.78% of its earnings as a dividend. SpartanNash's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Natural Foods quarterly revenues are $7.9B, which are larger than SpartanNash quarterly revenues of $2.3B. United Natural Foods's net income of -$21M is lower than SpartanNash's net income of $10.9M. Notably, United Natural Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SpartanNash's PE ratio is 13.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Natural Foods is 0.05x versus 0.06x for SpartanNash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.