SPTN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 0.07% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of 1.08%. SpartanNash's return on equity of -1.38% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 12.93%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $71.29 which suggests that it could grow by 15.97%. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than The Chefs' Warehouse, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than The Chefs' Warehouse.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 1.767, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.679%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SpartanNash pays 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $950.7M. SpartanNash's net income of $2.1M is lower than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $10.3M. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 40.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.06x versus 0.73x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.07% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of -0.26%. SpartanNash's return on equity of -1.38% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 1.34%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.578, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.226%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. SpartanNash pays 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SpartanNash's is not.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $619.5M. SpartanNash's net income of $2.1M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 39.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.06x versus 0.02x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Innovative Food Holdings has a net margin of 0.07% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of -2.2%. SpartanNash's return on equity of -1.38% beat Innovative Food Holdings's return on equity of 12.42%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand Innovative Food Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SpartanNash has higher upside potential than Innovative Food Holdings, analysts believe SpartanNash is more attractive than Innovative Food Holdings.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Innovative Food Holdings has a beta of -0.035, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.482%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. Innovative Food Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SpartanNash pays 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Innovative Food Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Innovative Food Holdings quarterly revenues of $19.5M. SpartanNash's net income of $2.1M is higher than Innovative Food Holdings's net income of -$430.4K. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while Innovative Food Holdings's PE ratio is 43.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.06x versus 0.89x for Innovative Food Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 0.07% compared to SpartanNash's net margin of -0.09%. SpartanNash's return on equity of -1.38% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.15%.

SpartanNash has a consensus price target of $20.50, signalling upside risk potential of 16.35%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $25.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.71%. Given that United Natural Foods has higher upside potential than SpartanNash, analysts believe United Natural Foods is more attractive than SpartanNash.

SpartanNash has a beta of 0.343, which suggesting that the stock is 65.688% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.900, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.965%.

SpartanNash has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.97%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SpartanNash pays 10003.01% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SpartanNash quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.1B. SpartanNash's net income of $2.1M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$7M. Notably, SpartanNash's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.77x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SpartanNash is 0.06x versus 0.04x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.