PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 14.22%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $151.55, signalling upside risk potential of 14.89%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 13.44%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.415%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.40x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 30.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.98x versus 2.99x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 29.92%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $151.55, signalling upside risk potential of 14.89%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.01%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.40x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.98x versus 6.67x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 14.94%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $151.55, signalling upside risk potential of 14.89%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $59.0178 which suggests that it could fall by -2.55%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.095%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.40x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 38.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.98x versus 8.19x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 10.24% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 19.06%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28% beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $151.55, signalling upside risk potential of 14.89%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 7.67%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Procter & Gamble, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Procter & Gamble.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, which suggesting that the stock is 52.85% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.11%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. PepsiCo pays 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $17.9B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.40x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 25.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 1.98x versus 4.67x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.