PEP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 15.83%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $177.98, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.46 which suggests that it could grow by 20.36%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Keurig Dr Pepper, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Keurig Dr Pepper.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.321%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 18.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.20x versus 2.83x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 24.03%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $177.98, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.30 which suggests that it could grow by 18.78%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.176%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are larger than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.20x versus 5.75x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 9.27%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.53%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $177.98, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $76.64 which suggests that it could grow by 31.49%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than PepsiCo.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.539, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.116%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are larger than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.2B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Mondelez International's net income of $853M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 20.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.20x versus 2.18x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 12.57% compared to PepsiCo's net margin of 19.72%. PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1%.

PepsiCo has a consensus price target of $177.98, signalling upside risk potential of 21.46%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $55.2884 which suggests that it could grow by 7.15%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

PepsiCo has a beta of 0.537, which suggesting that the stock is 46.305% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.741, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.947%.

PepsiCo has a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.64%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PepsiCo pays 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PepsiCo quarterly revenues are $23.3B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M. Notably, PepsiCo's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.61x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 33.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PepsiCo is 2.20x versus 7.18x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.