CELH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 29.92%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.94, signalling upside risk potential of 13.37%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $77.67 which suggests that it could grow by 7.72%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.575%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.1B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 119.26x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.74x versus 6.64x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 23.89%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.94, signalling upside risk potential of 13.37%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $61.4526 which suggests that it could fall by -3.91%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.095%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 119.26x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 39.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.74x versus 8.55x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of 10.24%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.94, signalling upside risk potential of 13.37%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $150.06 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 119.26x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.33x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.74x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Shot has a net margin of 13.49% compared to Celsius Holdings's net margin of -12652.75%. Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 9.09% beat Safety Shot's return on equity of -1243.79%.

Celsius Holdings has a consensus price target of $42.94, signalling upside risk potential of 13.37%. On the other hand Safety Shot has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1057.08%. Given that Safety Shot has higher upside potential than Celsius Holdings, analysts believe Safety Shot is more attractive than Celsius Holdings.

Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, which suggesting that the stock is 64.805% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Shot has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Celsius Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safety Shot offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Celsius Holdings pays 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Shot pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues are $329.3M, which are larger than Safety Shot quarterly revenues of $42.1K. Celsius Holdings's net income of $44.4M is higher than Safety Shot's net income of -$5.3M. Notably, Celsius Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 119.26x while Safety Shot's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Celsius Holdings is 6.74x versus 16.35x for Safety Shot. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.