MNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Vita Coco has a net margin of 19.72% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 14.49%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1% beat The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $55.2884, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand The Vita Coco has an analysts' consensus of $34.89 which suggests that it could grow by 2.68%. Given that Monster Beverage has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Monster Beverage is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Vita Coco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Vita Coco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are larger than The Vita Coco quarterly revenues of $132.9M. Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M is higher than The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while The Vita Coco's PE ratio is 34.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.18x versus 4.07x for The Vita Coco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 19.72% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 15.83%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $55.2884, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.46 which suggests that it could grow by 20.36%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.321%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 18.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.18x versus 2.83x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 19.72% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 24.03%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $55.2884, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.30 which suggests that it could grow by 18.78%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.176%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.18x versus 5.75x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 19.72% compared to Monster Beverage's net margin of 12.57%. Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.

Monster Beverage has a consensus price target of $55.2884, signalling upside risk potential of 7.15%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $177.98 which suggests that it could grow by 21.46%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.741, which suggesting that the stock is 25.947% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.305%.

Monster Beverage has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Monster Beverage pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Monster Beverage quarterly revenues are $1.9B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Monster Beverage's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.08x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Monster Beverage is 7.18x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.