COCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 14.22%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 17.52%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.485, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.497%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.86x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 29.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.70x versus 2.88x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 23.89%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 23.09%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $62.0178 which suggests that it could fall by -1.82%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.602, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.757%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $443M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.86x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 38.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.70x versus 8.37x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 10.24%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $150.06 which suggests that it could grow by 15.52%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than PepsiCo, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than PepsiCo.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.456, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.381%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.86x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.70x versus 1.95x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zevia PBC has a net margin of 14.42% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of -13.74%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.62% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -41.2%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $38.67, signalling upside risk potential of 16.5%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $4.13 which suggests that it could grow by 63.69%. Given that Zevia PBC has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Zevia PBC is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $130.9M, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $38M. The Vita Coco's net income of $18.9M is higher than Zevia PBC's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.86x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 3.70x versus 1.04x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.