COCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 19.01%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 38.7%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 6.2%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $74.64 which suggests that it could grow by 6.44%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.571, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.943%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.5B. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.2B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.51x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 28.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.05x versus 6.44x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 14.94%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 6.2%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $56.4254 which suggests that it could grow by 0.38%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.833%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are smaller than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is lower than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.51x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 35.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.05x versus 7.60x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellation Brands has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 25%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of 7.35%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 6.2%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $237.88 which suggests that it could grow by 29.56%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.898, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.187%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are smaller than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.5B. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is lower than Constellation Brands's net income of $615.9M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.51x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 49.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.05x versus 3.29x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zevia PBC has a net margin of 2.65% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of -14.61%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 24.22% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -38.47%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $37.44, signalling upside risk potential of 6.2%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $4.17 which suggests that it could grow by 87.69%. Given that Zevia PBC has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Zevia PBC is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $127.3M, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $39.5M. The Vita Coco's net income of $3.4M is higher than Zevia PBC's net income of -$5.8M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 37.51x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.05x versus 0.84x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.