COCO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ingredion has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 10.05%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat Ingredion's return on equity of 18.21%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $34.89, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Ingredion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.59%. Given that Ingredion has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Ingredion is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.339%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ingredion offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion pays out 30.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are smaller than Ingredion quarterly revenues of $1.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is lower than Ingredion's net income of $188M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.32x while Ingredion's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.07x versus 1.18x for Ingredion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 15.83%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $34.89, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.46 which suggests that it could grow by 20.36%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.321%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are smaller than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is lower than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.32x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 18.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.07x versus 2.83x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of 24.03%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $34.89, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.30 which suggests that it could grow by 18.78%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.176%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.32x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.07x versus 5.75x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zevia PBC has a net margin of 14.49% compared to The Vita Coco's net margin of -6.95%. The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26% beat Zevia PBC's return on equity of -37.54%.

The Vita Coco has a consensus price target of $34.89, signalling upside risk potential of 2.68%. On the other hand Zevia PBC has an analysts' consensus of $2.68 which suggests that it could fall by -28.85%. Given that The Vita Coco has higher upside potential than Zevia PBC, analysts believe The Vita Coco is more attractive than Zevia PBC.

The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zevia PBC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

The Vita Coco has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zevia PBC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. The Vita Coco pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zevia PBC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

The Vita Coco quarterly revenues are $132.9M, which are larger than Zevia PBC quarterly revenues of $36.4M. The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M is higher than Zevia PBC's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, The Vita Coco's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.32x while Zevia PBC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for The Vita Coco is 4.07x versus 1.56x for Zevia PBC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.