Financhill
Buy
52

KO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$72.40
Seasonality move :
3.65%
Day range:
$71.16 - $71.90
52-week range:
$60.62 - $74.38
Dividend yield:
2.74%
P/E ratio:
28.69x
P/S ratio:
6.60x
P/B ratio:
11.78x
Volume:
12.3M
Avg. volume:
18.1M
1-year change:
15.03%
Market cap:
$308.7B
Revenue:
$47.1B
EPS (TTM):
$2.50

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
KO
Coca-Cola
$11.2B $0.72 1.45% 49.43% $77.48
CELH
Celsius Holdings
$342.3M $0.19 34.12% 7.15% $42.16
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
$3.6B $0.38 5.46% 27.9% $38.62
MNST
Monster Beverage
$2B $0.46 7.07% 12.62% $59.0178
PEP
PepsiCo
$17.7B $1.49 -0.98% -7.91% $151.55
STZ
Constellation Brands
$2.1B $2.27 -3.83% -28.86% $216.09
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
KO
Coca-Cola
$71.72 $77.48 $308.7B 28.69x $0.51 2.74% 6.60x
CELH
Celsius Holdings
$35.52 $42.16 $9.1B 81.17x $0.00 0% 6.20x
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
$34.12 $38.62 $46.3B 31.02x $0.23 2.65% 2.99x
MNST
Monster Beverage
$60.0200 $59.0178 $58.4B 37.75x $0.00 0% 8.12x
PEP
PepsiCo
$130.74 $151.55 $179.3B 19.23x $1.36 4.15% 1.97x
STZ
Constellation Brands
$187.07 $216.09 $33.3B 49.30x $1.02 2.17% 3.33x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
KO
Coca-Cola
65.21% 0.095 15.85% 0.75x
CELH
Celsius Holdings
-- -2.825 -- 3.17x
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
39.45% 0.084 34.94% 0.24x
MNST
Monster Beverage
5.91% -0.639 0.73% 2.51x
PEP
PepsiCo
72.52% 0.175 23.55% 0.62x
STZ
Constellation Brands
62.56% 0.116 36.47% 0.26x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
KO
Coca-Cola
$7B $3.7B 14.82% 39.18% 39.93% -$5.5B
CELH
Celsius Holdings
$166.7M -$18.5M 12.16% 12.16% -5.57% $70.3M
KDP
Keurig Dr Pepper
$2B $801M 3.78% 6.11% 22.23% $75M
MNST
Monster Beverage
$1B $381.2M 20.8% 21.93% 21.04% $349.5M
PEP
PepsiCo
$10B $2.6B 14.47% 49.28% 14.54% -$1.6B
STZ
Constellation Brands
$1.1B $609.4M -0.4% -0.93% -11.2% $312.1M

Coca-Cola vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns KO or CELH?

    Celsius Holdings has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of -5.68%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Celsius Holdings's return on equity of 12.16%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    62.59% $0.77 $76.9B
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    50.17% -$0.11 $1.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About KO or CELH?

    Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.48, signalling upside risk potential of 8.03%. On the other hand Celsius Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $42.16 which suggests that it could grow by 18.7%. Given that Celsius Holdings has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Celsius Holdings is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    7 6 0
  • Is KO or CELH More Risky?

    Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Celsius Holdings has a beta of 1.648, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.805%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KO or CELH?

    Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Celsius Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Celsius Holdings pays out 18.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KO or CELH?

    Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Celsius Holdings quarterly revenues of $332.2M. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Celsius Holdings's net income of -$18.9M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while Celsius Holdings's PE ratio is 81.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 6.20x for Celsius Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.60x 28.69x $11.1B $3.3B
    CELH
    Celsius Holdings
    6.20x 81.17x $332.2M -$18.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns KO or KDP?

    Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.22%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 6.11%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    62.59% $0.77 $76.9B
    KDP
    Keurig Dr Pepper
    54.61% $0.38 $40.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About KO or KDP?

    Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.48, signalling upside risk potential of 8.03%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $38.62 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
    KDP
    Keurig Dr Pepper
    9 7 0
  • Is KO or KDP More Risky?

    Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.516, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.415%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KO or KDP?

    Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 82.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KO or KDP?

    Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $517M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 2.99x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.60x 28.69x $11.1B $3.3B
    KDP
    Keurig Dr Pepper
    2.99x 31.02x $3.6B $517M
  • Which has Higher Returns KO or MNST?

    Monster Beverage has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.94%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 21.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    62.59% $0.77 $76.9B
    MNST
    Monster Beverage
    55.32% $0.38 $6.3B
  • What do Analysts Say About KO or MNST?

    Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.48, signalling upside risk potential of 8.03%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $59.0178 which suggests that it could fall by -1.67%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
    MNST
    Monster Beverage
    9 10 1
  • Is KO or MNST More Risky?

    Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.095%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KO or MNST?

    Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KO or MNST?

    Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $270.7M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 37.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 8.12x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.60x 28.69x $11.1B $3.3B
    MNST
    Monster Beverage
    8.12x 37.75x $1.8B $270.7M
  • Which has Higher Returns KO or PEP?

    PepsiCo has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 10.24%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    62.59% $0.77 $76.9B
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    55.77% $1.33 $67B
  • What do Analysts Say About KO or PEP?

    Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.48, signalling upside risk potential of 8.03%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $151.55 which suggests that it could grow by 15.92%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    3 16 1
  • Is KO or PEP More Risky?

    Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KO or PEP?

    Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KO or PEP?

    Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 1.97x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.60x 28.69x $11.1B $3.3B
    PEP
    PepsiCo
    1.97x 19.23x $17.9B $1.8B
  • Which has Higher Returns KO or STZ?

    Constellation Brands has a net margin of 29.92% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of -17.34%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 39.18% beat Constellation Brands's return on equity of -0.93%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    62.59% $0.77 $76.9B
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    51.51% -$2.09 $18.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About KO or STZ?

    Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $77.48, signalling upside risk potential of 8.03%. On the other hand Constellation Brands has an analysts' consensus of $216.09 which suggests that it could grow by 15.52%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    14 4 0
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    8 11 0
  • Is KO or STZ More Risky?

    Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.474, which suggesting that the stock is 52.575% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.57%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock KO or STZ?

    Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.74%. Constellation Brands offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Coca-Cola pays 78.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands pays out -899.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios KO or STZ?

    Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.1B, which are larger than Constellation Brands quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Coca-Cola's net income of $3.3B is higher than Constellation Brands's net income of -$375.3M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while Constellation Brands's PE ratio is 49.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 6.60x versus 3.33x for Constellation Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    KO
    Coca-Cola
    6.60x 28.69x $11.1B $3.3B
    STZ
    Constellation Brands
    3.33x 49.30x $2.2B -$375.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?

For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…

Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?
Is Broadcom Stock a Millionaire Maker?

Broadcom (Nasdaq: AVGO) stock has gone up more than 64%…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
60
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 7

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 22.52% over the past day.

Buy
77
FARO alert for May 7

Faro Technologies [FARO] is down 0% over the past day.

Buy
53
SRPT alert for May 7

Sarepta Therapeutics [SRPT] is down 21.54% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock