KO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Vita Coco has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 14.49%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.30, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand The Vita Coco has an analysts' consensus of $34.89 which suggests that it could grow by 2.68%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. The Vita Coco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. The Vita Coco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than The Vita Coco quarterly revenues of $132.9M. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is higher than The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while The Vita Coco's PE ratio is 34.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.75x versus 4.07x for The Vita Coco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Keurig Dr Pepper has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 15.83%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat Keurig Dr Pepper's return on equity of 9.08%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.30, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Keurig Dr Pepper has an analysts' consensus of $37.46 which suggests that it could grow by 20.36%. Given that Keurig Dr Pepper has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Keurig Dr Pepper is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Keurig Dr Pepper has a beta of 0.617, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.321%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Keurig Dr Pepper offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Keurig Dr Pepper pays out 52.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than Keurig Dr Pepper quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is higher than Keurig Dr Pepper's net income of $616M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while Keurig Dr Pepper's PE ratio is 18.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.75x versus 2.83x for Keurig Dr Pepper. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Monster Beverage has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 19.72%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat Monster Beverage's return on equity of 22.1%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.30, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Monster Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $55.2884 which suggests that it could grow by 7.15%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Monster Beverage, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Monster Beverage.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Monster Beverage has a beta of 0.741, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.947%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. Monster Beverage offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Monster Beverage pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are larger than Monster Beverage quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is higher than Monster Beverage's net income of $370.9M. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while Monster Beverage's PE ratio is 33.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.75x versus 7.18x for Monster Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 24.03% compared to Coca-Cola's net margin of 12.57%. Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49% beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 48.74%.

Coca-Cola has a consensus price target of $73.30, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $177.98 which suggests that it could grow by 21.46%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, which suggesting that the stock is 39.176% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.537, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.305%.

Coca-Cola has a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.14%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 3.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Coca-Cola pays 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 73.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Coca-Cola quarterly revenues are $11.9B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $23.3B. Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B is lower than PepsiCo's net income of $2.9B. Notably, Coca-Cola's price-to-earnings ratio is 25.50x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 21.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Coca-Cola is 5.75x versus 2.20x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.