STZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Vita Coco has a net margin of -41.08% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 14.49%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 6% beat The Vita Coco's return on equity of 27.26%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $286.32, signalling upside risk potential of 31.04%. On the other hand The Vita Coco has an analysts' consensus of $34.11 which suggests that it could grow by 0.3%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than The Vita Coco, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than The Vita Coco.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Vita Coco has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. The Vita Coco offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. The Vita Coco pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than The Vita Coco quarterly revenues of $132.9M. Constellation Brands's net income of -$1.2B is lower than The Vita Coco's net income of $19.3M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.72x while The Vita Coco's PE ratio is 34.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.93x versus 4.07x for The Vita Coco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Coca-Cola has a net margin of -41.08% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 24.03%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 6% beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $286.32, signalling upside risk potential of 31.04%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $73.55 which suggests that it could grow by 20.89%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Coca-Cola, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Coca-Cola.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.176%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$1.2B is lower than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.72x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.93x versus 5.67x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Boston Beer has a net margin of -41.08% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 5.54%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 6% beat Boston Beer's return on equity of 7.58%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $286.32, signalling upside risk potential of 31.04%. On the other hand Boston Beer has an analysts' consensus of $311.31 which suggests that it could grow by 11.08%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Boston Beer, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Boston Beer.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boston Beer has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.652%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Boston Beer offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Boston Beer pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Boston Beer quarterly revenues of $605.5M. Constellation Brands's net income of -$1.2B is lower than Boston Beer's net income of $33.5M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.72x while Boston Beer's PE ratio is 41.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.93x versus 1.68x for Boston Beer. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Molson Coors Beverage has a net margin of -41.08% compared to Constellation Brands's net margin of 6.57%. Constellation Brands's return on equity of 6% beat Molson Coors Beverage's return on equity of 6.97%.

Constellation Brands has a consensus price target of $286.32, signalling upside risk potential of 31.04%. On the other hand Molson Coors Beverage has an analysts' consensus of $63.16 which suggests that it could grow by 14.45%. Given that Constellation Brands has higher upside potential than Molson Coors Beverage, analysts believe Constellation Brands is more attractive than Molson Coors Beverage.

Constellation Brands has a beta of 0.915, which suggesting that the stock is 8.498% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 0.860, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.997%.

Constellation Brands has a quarterly dividend of $1.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.79%. Molson Coors Beverage offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. Constellation Brands pays 37.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Molson Coors Beverage pays out 37.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Brands quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are smaller than Molson Coors Beverage quarterly revenues of $3B. Constellation Brands's net income of -$1.2B is lower than Molson Coors Beverage's net income of $199.8M. Notably, Constellation Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.72x while Molson Coors Beverage's PE ratio is 12.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Brands is 3.93x versus 1.00x for Molson Coors Beverage. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.