PM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Altria Group has a net margin of 28.92% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 23.83%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $174.68, signalling downside risk potential of -2.54%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of $58.37 which suggests that it could fall by -2.09%. Given that Philip Morris International has more downside risk than Altria Group, analysts believe Altria Group is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.487%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Altria Group offers a yield of 6.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 60.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $4.5B. Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B is higher than Altria Group's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.95x while Altria Group's PE ratio is 9.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 7.27x versus 5.01x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PepsiCo has a net margin of 28.92% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 10.24%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat PepsiCo's return on equity of 49.28%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $174.68, signalling downside risk potential of -2.54%. On the other hand PepsiCo has an analysts' consensus of $150.06 which suggests that it could grow by 14.23%. Given that PepsiCo has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe PepsiCo is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PepsiCo has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.85%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. PepsiCo offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo pays out 75.48% of its earnings as a dividend. PepsiCo's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are smaller than PepsiCo quarterly revenues of $17.9B. Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B is higher than PepsiCo's net income of $1.8B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.95x while PepsiCo's PE ratio is 19.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 7.27x versus 1.98x for PepsiCo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Procter & Gamble has a net margin of 28.92% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 19.06%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Procter & Gamble's return on equity of 30.14%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $174.68, signalling downside risk potential of -2.54%. On the other hand Procter & Gamble has an analysts' consensus of $171.51 which suggests that it could grow by 2.24%. Given that Procter & Gamble has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Procter & Gamble is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Procter & Gamble has a beta of 0.414, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.603%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Procter & Gamble offers a yield of 2.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.06 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble pays out 62.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Procter & Gamble's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are smaller than Procter & Gamble quarterly revenues of $19.8B. Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B is lower than Procter & Gamble's net income of $3.8B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.95x while Procter & Gamble's PE ratio is 26.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 7.27x versus 4.92x for Procter & Gamble. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Turning Point Brands has a net margin of 28.92% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 13.53%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Turning Point Brands's return on equity of 23.04%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $174.68, signalling downside risk potential of -2.54%. On the other hand Turning Point Brands has an analysts' consensus of $77.50 which suggests that it could grow by 23.21%. Given that Turning Point Brands has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Turning Point Brands is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.499, which suggesting that the stock is 50.144% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Turning Point Brands has a beta of 0.694, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.585%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.99%. Turning Point Brands offers a yield of 0.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Philip Morris International pays 116.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands pays out 12.32% of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Turning Point Brands quarterly revenues of $106.4M. Philip Morris International's net income of $2.7B is higher than Turning Point Brands's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.95x while Turning Point Brands's PE ratio is 32.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 7.27x versus 3.75x for Turning Point Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.