PM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coca-Cola has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 24.03%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Coca-Cola's return on equity of 37.49%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $135.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand Coca-Cola has an analysts' consensus of $72.47 which suggests that it could grow by 15.56%. Given that Coca-Cola has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Coca-Cola is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coca-Cola has a beta of 0.608, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.176%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Coca-Cola offers a yield of 3.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola pays out 74.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Coca-Cola's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than Coca-Cola quarterly revenues of $11.9B. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is higher than Coca-Cola's net income of $2.8B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.30x while Coca-Cola's PE ratio is 25.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.08x versus 5.85x for Coca-Cola. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Altria Group has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 42.91%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Altria Group's return on equity of --.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $135.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand Altria Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.59 which suggests that it could grow by 9.12%. Given that Philip Morris International has higher upside potential than Altria Group, analysts believe Philip Morris International is more attractive than Altria Group.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Altria Group has a beta of 0.644, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.63%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Altria Group offers a yield of 7.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.02 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group pays out 83.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Altria Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Altria Group quarterly revenues of $5.3B. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is higher than Altria Group's net income of $2.3B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.30x while Altria Group's PE ratio is 8.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.08x versus 4.42x for Altria Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Turning Point Brands has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 11.72%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Turning Point Brands's return on equity of 29.17%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $135.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand Turning Point Brands has an analysts' consensus of $68.75 which suggests that it could grow by 19.4%. Given that Turning Point Brands has higher upside potential than Philip Morris International, analysts believe Turning Point Brands is more attractive than Philip Morris International.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Turning Point Brands has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.709%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Turning Point Brands offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands pays out 11.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Turning Point Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Turning Point Brands quarterly revenues of $105.6M. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is higher than Turning Point Brands's net income of $12.4M. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.30x while Turning Point Brands's PE ratio is 22.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.08x versus 2.80x for Turning Point Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walmart has a net margin of 31.1% compared to Philip Morris International's net margin of 2.7%. Philip Morris International's return on equity of -- beat Walmart's return on equity of 21.87%.

Philip Morris International has a consensus price target of $135.86, signalling upside risk potential of 11.74%. On the other hand Walmart has an analysts' consensus of $98.4684 which suggests that it could grow by 7.1%. Given that Philip Morris International has higher upside potential than Walmart, analysts believe Philip Morris International is more attractive than Walmart.

Philip Morris International has a beta of 0.541, which suggesting that the stock is 45.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walmart has a beta of 0.549, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.142%.

Philip Morris International has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.36%. Walmart offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Philip Morris International pays 101.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart pays out 39.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Walmart's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Philip Morris International's is not.

Philip Morris International quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than Walmart quarterly revenues of $169.6B. Philip Morris International's net income of $3.1B is lower than Walmart's net income of $4.6B. Notably, Philip Morris International's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.30x while Walmart's PE ratio is 37.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Philip Morris International is 5.08x versus 1.10x for Walmart. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.