AA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of -10.69%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 29.17%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.19 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.859%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 0.19x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellium SE has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 1.87%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 7.91%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 29.17%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $15.07 which suggests that it could grow by 10.27%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Constellium SE, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Constellium SE.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.617, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.722%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $2B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Constellium SE's net income of $37M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 29.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 0.27x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 2.78%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 29.17%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.53%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.302%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 28.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 0.41x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of -3.11%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 29.17%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $48.36 which suggests that it could fall by -9.96%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than United States Steel.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.264, which suggesting that the stock is 126.433% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.869, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.943%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$116M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.54x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 185.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.53x versus 0.87x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.