AA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Alcoa's net margin of -10.34%. Alcoa's return on equity of 1.1% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $46.97, signalling upside risk potential of 53.99%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 45.99%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.280, which suggesting that the stock is 128.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.930, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.028%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Alcoa's net income of $202M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.55x versus 0.21x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 1.45%. Alcoa's return on equity of 1.1% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $46.97, signalling upside risk potential of 53.99%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $57.21 which suggests that it could grow by 24.34%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.280, which suggesting that the stock is 128.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.354%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alcoa's is not.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Alcoa's net income of $202M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 76.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.55x versus 0.69x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 0.93%. Alcoa's return on equity of 1.1% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $46.97, signalling upside risk potential of 53.99%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $79.67 which suggests that it could grow by 31.42%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.280, which suggesting that the stock is 128.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.319, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.862%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 5.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. Alcoa's net income of $202M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 21.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.55x versus 0.33x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 5.8% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 5.35%. Alcoa's return on equity of 1.1% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $46.97, signalling upside risk potential of 53.99%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.09 which suggests that it could grow by 16.8%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.280, which suggesting that the stock is 128.041% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.347, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.654%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.31%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alcoa's is not.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Alcoa's net income of $202M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.55x versus 1.11x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.