AA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of -10.34%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $10.91 which suggests that it could grow by 22.87%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.289, which suggesting that the stock is 128.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 2.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 103.452%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.69x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.47x versus 0.22x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 1.45%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 1.76%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $53.28 which suggests that it could grow by 14.65%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Commercial Metals, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Commercial Metals.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.289, which suggesting that the stock is 128.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.292, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.238%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alcoa's is not.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Commercial Metals's net income of $25.5M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.69x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 77.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.47x versus 0.69x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 2.78%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -0.23%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.289, which suggesting that the stock is 128.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.398, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.799%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.69x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 25.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.47x versus 0.37x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 16.27% compared to Alcoa's net margin of 4.97%. Alcoa's return on equity of 15.83% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Alcoa has a consensus price target of $36.62, signalling upside risk potential of 43.44%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.01 which suggests that it could grow by 7.46%. Given that Alcoa has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Alcoa is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Alcoa has a beta of 2.289, which suggesting that the stock is 128.912% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.442, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.234%.

Alcoa has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.57%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Alcoa pays 150% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Alcoa's is not.

Alcoa quarterly revenues are $3.4B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Alcoa's net income of $548M is higher than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Alcoa's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.69x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Alcoa is 0.47x versus 1.21x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.