KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 7.16%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.18%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.87%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.143%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.37x versus 0.85x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -10.34%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.18%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.33%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.37x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellium SE has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -2.77%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 5.77%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.18%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $18.92 which suggests that it could grow by 59.01%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 2.123, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.313%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is higher than Constellium SE's net income of -$43.4M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 37.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.37x versus 0.25x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 0.93% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $79.67, signalling upside risk potential of 15.18%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.70 which suggests that it could grow by 18.22%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, which suggesting that the stock is 37.517% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.45%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $765.4M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.10x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.37x versus 1.10x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.