KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 8.77%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $67.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.07%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 28.04%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.576%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $539.1M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.27x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus 0.86x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Constellium SE has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 0.12%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Constellium SE's return on equity of 10.74%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $67.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.07%. On the other hand Constellium SE has an analysts' consensus of $24.70 which suggests that it could grow by 75.55%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellium SE has a beta of 1.972, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.244%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Constellium SE offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellium SE pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are smaller than Constellium SE quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is higher than Constellium SE's net income of $2.2M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.27x while Constellium SE's PE ratio is 14.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus 0.21x for Constellium SE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuse Group Holding has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of --. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Fuse Group Holding's return on equity of --.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $67.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.07%. On the other hand Fuse Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Kaiser Aluminum has higher upside potential than Fuse Group Holding, analysts believe Kaiser Aluminum is more attractive than Fuse Group Holding.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuse Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Fuse Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Fuse Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are larger than Fuse Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is higher than Fuse Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.27x while Fuse Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus -- for Fuse Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 7.32%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $67.33, signalling upside risk potential of 15.07%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 18.83%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, which suggesting that the stock is 32.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.38%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.27x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.38x versus 1.04x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.