KALU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 8.77%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.82%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.2%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 153.235%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $539.1M. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.40x versus 0.89x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of -5.3%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.82%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.72 which suggests that it could grow by 27.1%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.089%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.40x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 3.36%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.82%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.71 which suggests that it could grow by 27.46%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.40x versus 0.94x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Kaiser Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a consensus price target of $81.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.82%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $138.87 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that Steel Dynamics has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Steel Dynamics is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.349, which suggesting that the stock is 34.878% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Kaiser Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.25%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Kaiser Aluminum pays 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Kaiser Aluminum's is not.

Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues are $747.7M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Kaiser Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.98x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Kaiser Aluminum is 0.40x versus 1.09x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.