CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Nucor has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 3.36%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.72, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.71 which suggests that it could grow by 27.46%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, which suggesting that the stock is 97.089% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 0.94x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 5.35%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.72, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $138.87 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, which suggesting that the stock is 97.089% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 1.09x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worthington Steel has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 1.73%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03% beat Worthington Steel's return on equity of 12.7%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.72, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand Worthington Steel has an analysts' consensus of $41.00 which suggests that it could grow by 37.63%. Given that Worthington Steel has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Worthington Steel is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, which suggesting that the stock is 97.089% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worthington Steel has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worthington Steel offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worthington Steel pays out 102.07% of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than Worthington Steel quarterly revenues of $739M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M is lower than Worthington Steel's net income of $12.8M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Worthington Steel's PE ratio is 10.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 0.46x for Worthington Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 3.09%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 3.47%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.72, signalling upside risk potential of 27.1%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $39.57 which suggests that it could grow by 5.77%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than United States Steel.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, which suggesting that the stock is 97.089% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.6B, which are larger than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M is lower than United States Steel's net income of $119M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 24.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 0.59x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.