CLF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -10.34% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 7.16%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.33%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.87%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.143%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 0.85x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Commercial Metals has a net margin of -10.34% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of -9.2%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21% beat Commercial Metals's return on equity of 3.18%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.33%. On the other hand Commercial Metals has an analysts' consensus of $58.21 which suggests that it could grow by 30.83%. Given that Commercial Metals has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Commercial Metals is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Commercial Metals has a beta of 1.168, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.765%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Commercial Metals offers a yield of 1.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals pays out 16.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Commercial Metals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Commercial Metals quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M is lower than Commercial Metals's net income of -$175.7M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Commercial Metals's PE ratio is 40.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 0.66x for Commercial Metals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -10.34% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 4.06%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.33%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.62 which suggests that it could grow by 20.12%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Nucor.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.84%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M is lower than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Nucor's PE ratio is 15.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 1.01x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -10.34% compared to Cleveland-Cliffs's net margin of 5.35%. Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a consensus price target of $12.00, signalling upside risk potential of 23.33%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.70 which suggests that it could grow by 18.22%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, which suggesting that the stock is 94.16% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Cleveland-Cliffs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues are $4.3B, which are larger than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Cleveland-Cliffs's price-to-earnings ratio is 175.97x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cleveland-Cliffs is 0.24x versus 1.10x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.