CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -5.3%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.2%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.72 which suggests that it could grow by 27.1%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.089%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.89x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 1.61%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.2%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.82%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.349, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.878%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.89x versus 0.40x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 3.36%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.2%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.71 which suggests that it could grow by 27.46%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.89x versus 0.94x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.2%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $138.87 which suggests that it could grow by 13.5%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.532, which suggesting that the stock is 153.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.358, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.817%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.57x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.89x versus 1.09x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.