CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -10.69%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -16.75%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.92%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $9.19 which suggests that it could grow by 28.12%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.545, which suggesting that the stock is 154.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.859%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$495M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.78x versus 0.19x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 2.78%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 6.41%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.92%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $69.00 which suggests that it could fall by -9.53%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.545, which suggesting that the stock is 154.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.302%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $777.4M. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $21.6M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 28.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.78x versus 0.41x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 4.97%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.92%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $147.22 which suggests that it could grow by 11.66%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.545, which suggesting that the stock is 154.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.919%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.43% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 17.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.78x versus 1.18x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 4.69% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -3.11%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 18.99% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $22.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.92%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $48.36 which suggests that it could fall by -9.96%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than United States Steel.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.545, which suggesting that the stock is 154.539% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.869, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.943%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $633.9M, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Century Aluminum's net income of $29.7M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$116M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.43x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 185.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.78x versus 0.87x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.