CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -5.3%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 28.04%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $14.40 which suggests that it could grow by 52.23%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.926, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.634%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 167.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.86x versus 0.23x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 1.61%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 28.04%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $67.33 which suggests that it could grow by 15.07%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.793%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.86x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 3.36%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 28.04%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $163.96 which suggests that it could grow by 39.63%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.201%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.86x versus 0.91x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 8.77% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 7.32%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $24.33, signalling upside risk potential of 28.04%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 18.83%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, which suggesting that the stock is 149.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $539.1M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.36x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.86x versus 1.04x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.