CSTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of -2.77% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 7.16%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 5.77% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $18.92, signalling upside risk potential of 55.29%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $25.00 which suggests that it could grow by 22.25%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Constellium SE has a beta of 2.123, which suggesting that the stock is 112.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 167.143%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $630.9M. Constellium SE's net income of -$43.4M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.87x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.25x versus 0.89x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuse Group Holding has a net margin of -2.77% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of --. Constellium SE's return on equity of 5.77% beat Fuse Group Holding's return on equity of --.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $18.92, signalling upside risk potential of 55.29%. On the other hand Fuse Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Fuse Group Holding, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Fuse Group Holding.

Constellium SE has a beta of 2.123, which suggesting that the stock is 112.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuse Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuse Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuse Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Fuse Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Constellium SE's net income of -$43.4M is higher than Fuse Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.87x while Fuse Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.25x versus -- for Fuse Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -2.77% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 0.93%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 5.77% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $18.92, signalling upside risk potential of 55.29%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $79.67 which suggests that it could grow by 13.16%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Constellium SE has a beta of 2.123, which suggesting that the stock is 112.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.517%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. Constellium SE's net income of -$43.4M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.87x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.25x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of -2.77% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 5.35%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 5.77% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $18.92, signalling upside risk potential of 55.29%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.32 which suggests that it could grow by 16.62%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Constellium SE has a beta of 2.123, which suggesting that the stock is 112.313% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Constellium SE's net income of -$43.4M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.87x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.25x versus 1.11x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.