SES Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -1693.38% compared to SES AI's net margin of -793.92%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 127.38%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $26.67 which suggests that it could grow by 428.05%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.736, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.614%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. SES AI's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 2.00x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of -1693.38% compared to SES AI's net margin of 4.75%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 127.38%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.72%. Given that SES AI has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe SES AI is more attractive than Miller Industries.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.092%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $221.9M. SES AI's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 8.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 0.41x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -1693.38% compared to SES AI's net margin of 9.17%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 127.38%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $343.11 which suggests that it could grow by 37.25%. Given that SES AI has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe SES AI is more attractive than Tesla.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. SES AI's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 122.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 8.95x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -1693.38% compared to SES AI's net margin of -132.43%. SES AI's return on equity of -- beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

SES AI has a consensus price target of $1.00, signalling upside risk potential of 127.38%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.58 which suggests that it could grow by 337.32%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than SES AI.

SES AI has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.874%.

SES AI has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SES AI pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SES AI quarterly revenues are $2M, which are smaller than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. SES AI's net income of -$34.5M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, SES AI's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SES AI is -- versus 1.35x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.