HOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Miller Industries has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 4.75%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.72%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.092%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $221.9M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.38x while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 8.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.63x versus 0.41x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 0.6%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Polaris's return on equity of 8.17%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $54.38 which suggests that it could grow by 28.48%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.843%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Polaris offers a yield of 6.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Polaris's is not.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Polaris's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.38x while Polaris's PE ratio is 21.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.63x versus 0.33x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 6.27%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 49.44%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $58.18 which suggests that it could grow by 12.24%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.847, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.287%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 42.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $236.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.38x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 25.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.63x versus 1.88x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -17% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -132.43%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 13.71% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $31.22, signalling upside risk potential of 27.13%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.58 which suggests that it could grow by 337.32%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.494, which suggesting that the stock is 49.381% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.874%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.84%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $687.6M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Harley-Davidson's net income of -$116.9M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.38x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.63x versus 1.35x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.