HOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -793.92%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $37.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.98%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $27.08 which suggests that it could grow by 303.03%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.603, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.272%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is higher than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.71x versus 2.66x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 4.91%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 19.16%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $37.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.98%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.88%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.985, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.518%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 14.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $314.3M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is higher than Miller Industries's net income of $15.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 11.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.71x versus 0.59x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tractor Supply has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 6.96%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat Tractor Supply's return on equity of 50.68%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $37.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.98%. On the other hand Tractor Supply has an analysts' consensus of $58.25 which suggests that it could grow by 8.56%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Tractor Supply, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Tractor Supply.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tractor Supply has a beta of 0.844, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.552%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Tractor Supply offers a yield of 1.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Tractor Supply pays out 40.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Tractor Supply quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is lower than Tractor Supply's net income of $241.5M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while Tractor Supply's PE ratio is 26.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.71x versus 1.97x for Tractor Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of 10.35% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -132.43%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 17.84% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $37.17, signalling upside risk potential of 27.98%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.75 which suggests that it could grow by 112.59%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.483, which suggesting that the stock is 48.316% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 0.468, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.154%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 13.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $119M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.54x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.71x versus 3.08x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.