HOG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Acushnet Holdings has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -0.25%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat Acushnet Holdings's return on equity of 24.06%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.58, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Acushnet Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $67.00 which suggests that it could fall by -2.02%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Acushnet Holdings, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Acushnet Holdings.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Acushnet Holdings has a beta of 0.897, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.265%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. Acushnet Holdings offers a yield of 1.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Acushnet Holdings pays out 25.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Acushnet Holdings quarterly revenues of $445.2M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is higher than Acushnet Holdings's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.57x while Acushnet Holdings's PE ratio is 20.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.62x versus 1.77x for Acushnet Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Malibu Boats has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 1.18%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat Malibu Boats's return on equity of -16.06%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.58, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Malibu Boats has an analysts' consensus of $39.71 which suggests that it could grow by 33.45%. Given that Malibu Boats has higher upside potential than Harley-Davidson, analysts believe Malibu Boats is more attractive than Harley-Davidson.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Malibu Boats has a beta of 1.235, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.502%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. Malibu Boats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Malibu Boats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are larger than Malibu Boats quarterly revenues of $200.3M. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is higher than Malibu Boats's net income of $2.4M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.57x while Malibu Boats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.62x versus 0.82x for Malibu Boats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of -4.35%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat Polaris's return on equity of 3.05%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.58, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $35.45 which suggests that it could grow by 5.21%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Polaris, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Polaris.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.055, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.509%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. Polaris offers a yield of 7.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Polaris's is not.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is higher than Polaris's net income of -$66.8M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.57x while Polaris's PE ratio is 46.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.62x versus 0.27x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 10.01% compared to Harley-Davidson's net margin of 2.12%. Harley-Davidson's return on equity of 10.7% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Harley-Davidson has a consensus price target of $28.58, signalling upside risk potential of 24.36%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $289.44 which suggests that it could grow by 5.12%. Given that Harley-Davidson has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Harley-Davidson is more attractive than Tesla.

Harley-Davidson has a beta of 1.303, which suggesting that the stock is 30.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Harley-Davidson has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.04%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Harley-Davidson pays 20.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harley-Davidson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Harley-Davidson quarterly revenues are $1.3B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Harley-Davidson's net income of $133.1M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Harley-Davidson's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.57x while Tesla's PE ratio is 151.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Harley-Davidson is 0.62x versus 10.09x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.