PII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has a net margin of 0.6% compared to Polaris's net margin of --. Polaris's return on equity of 8.17% beat Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's return on equity of --.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings.

Polaris has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Life Electric Vehicles Holdings has a beta of -18.831, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1983.129%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Life Electric Vehicles Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Life Electric Vehicles Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Polaris's net income of $10.6M is higher than Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Life Electric Vehicles Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.33x versus -- for Life Electric Vehicles Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Massimo Group has a net margin of 0.6% compared to Polaris's net margin of -9.77%. Polaris's return on equity of 8.17% beat Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Massimo Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Massimo Group.

Polaris has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Massimo Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Massimo Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Massimo Group quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Polaris's net income of $10.6M is higher than Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Massimo Group's PE ratio is 14.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.33x versus 0.85x for Massimo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of 0.6% compared to Polaris's net margin of -86.59%. Polaris's return on equity of 8.17% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1901%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Polaris, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Polaris.

Polaris has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Polaris's net income of $10.6M is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.33x versus 0.18x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vivic has a net margin of 0.6% compared to Polaris's net margin of 16.52%. Polaris's return on equity of 8.17% beat Vivic's return on equity of 185.07%.

Polaris has a consensus price target of $53.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Vivic has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Vivic.

Polaris has a beta of 1.538, which suggesting that the stock is 53.843% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vivic has a beta of 0.471, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.87%.

Polaris has a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.26%. Vivic offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Polaris pays 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend. Vivic pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Polaris quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Vivic quarterly revenues of $2.6M. Polaris's net income of $10.6M is higher than Vivic's net income of $425.2K. Notably, Polaris's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.60x while Vivic's PE ratio is 45.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Polaris is 0.33x versus 2.18x for Vivic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.