VIVC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Massimo Group has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Vivic's net margin of -9.77%. Vivic's return on equity of 185.07% beat Massimo Group's return on equity of 40.58%.

Vivic has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Massimo Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vivic has higher upside potential than Massimo Group, analysts believe Vivic is more attractive than Massimo Group.

Vivic has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Massimo Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Massimo Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Massimo Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivic quarterly revenues are $2.6M, which are smaller than Massimo Group quarterly revenues of $25.6M. Vivic's net income of $425.2K is higher than Massimo Group's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Vivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.55x while Massimo Group's PE ratio is 15.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivic is 2.18x versus 0.88x for Massimo Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Polaris has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Vivic's net margin of 0.6%. Vivic's return on equity of 185.07% beat Polaris's return on equity of 8.17%.

Vivic has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Polaris has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 28.48%. Given that Polaris has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Polaris is more attractive than Vivic.

Vivic has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Polaris has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.843%.

Vivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Polaris offers a yield of 6.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.67 per share. Vivic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Polaris pays out 133.3% of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivic quarterly revenues are $2.6M, which are smaller than Polaris quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Vivic's net income of $425.2K is lower than Polaris's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Vivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.55x while Polaris's PE ratio is 21.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivic is 2.18x versus 0.33x for Polaris. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Vivic's net margin of 9.17%. Vivic's return on equity of 185.07% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Vivic has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $343.11 which suggests that it could grow by 37.25%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Vivic.

Vivic has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Vivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivic quarterly revenues are $2.6M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Vivic's net income of $425.2K is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Vivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.55x while Tesla's PE ratio is 122.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivic is 2.18x versus 8.95x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of 16.52% compared to Vivic's net margin of -86.59%. Vivic's return on equity of 185.07% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03%.

Vivic has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1901%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Vivic, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Vivic.

Vivic has a beta of 0.471, which suggesting that the stock is 52.87% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vivic has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivic pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vivic quarterly revenues are $2.6M, which are smaller than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Vivic's net income of $425.2K is higher than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Vivic's price-to-earnings ratio is 45.55x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivic is 2.18x versus 0.18x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.