GM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lucid Group has a net margin of 6.27% compared to General Motors's net margin of -496.14%. General Motors's return on equity of 15.22% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -71.79%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $59.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $3.27 which suggests that it could fall by -11.78%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Lucid Group.

General Motors has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $48.8B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $200M. General Motors's net income of $3.1B is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$992.5M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.70x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.35x versus 10.11x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 6.27% compared to General Motors's net margin of -125.86%. General Motors's return on equity of 15.22% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -68.23%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $59.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $15.03 which suggests that it could grow by 6.92%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

General Motors has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $48.8B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $874M. General Motors's net income of $3.1B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.70x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.35x versus 3.05x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 6.27% compared to General Motors's net margin of 8.61%. General Motors's return on equity of 15.22% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $59.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -38.59%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

General Motors has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. General Motors pays 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $48.8B, which are larger than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. General Motors's net income of $3.1B is higher than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.70x while Tesla's PE ratio is 126.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.35x versus 16.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 6.27% compared to General Motors's net margin of -0.83%. General Motors's return on equity of 15.22% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -1.38%.

General Motors has a consensus price target of $59.40, signalling upside risk potential of 11.01%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $64.90 which suggests that it could grow by 35.52%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than General Motors.

General Motors has a beta of 1.422, which suggesting that the stock is 42.238% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.601, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.126%.

General Motors has a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.9%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. General Motors pays 5.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Winnebago Industries's is not.

General Motors quarterly revenues are $48.8B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $625.6M. General Motors's net income of $3.1B is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$5.2M. Notably, General Motors's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.70x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 166.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for General Motors is 0.35x versus 0.49x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.