TSLA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Motors has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of -6.21%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $326.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $61.10 which suggests that it could grow by 27.36%. Given that General Motors has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe General Motors is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.576, which suggesting that the stock is 157.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.275, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.509%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 138.61x while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.12x versus 0.29x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of -169.41%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $326.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.55 which suggests that it could grow by 6.44%. Given that Tesla has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Tesla is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Tesla has a beta of 2.576, which suggesting that the stock is 157.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 138.61x while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.12x versus 7.26x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rivian Automotive has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of -42.85%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $326.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Rivian Automotive has an analysts' consensus of $14.67 which suggests that it could grow by 17.46%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.576, which suggesting that the stock is 157.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rivian Automotive offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rivian Automotive pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 138.61x while Rivian Automotive's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.12x versus 2.55x for Rivian Automotive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Winnebago Industries has a net margin of 9.17% compared to Tesla's net margin of -0.07%. Tesla's return on equity of 10.47% beat Winnebago Industries's return on equity of -0.45%.

Tesla has a consensus price target of $326.27, signalling upside risk potential of 15.77%. On the other hand Winnebago Industries has an analysts' consensus of $52.08 which suggests that it could grow by 45.32%. Given that Winnebago Industries has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Winnebago Industries is more attractive than Tesla.

Tesla has a beta of 2.576, which suggesting that the stock is 157.555% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Winnebago Industries has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.99%.

Tesla has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Winnebago Industries offers a yield of 3.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Tesla pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Winnebago Industries pays out 283.08% of its earnings as a dividend.

Tesla quarterly revenues are $25.7B, which are larger than Winnebago Industries quarterly revenues of $620.2M. Tesla's net income of $2.4B is higher than Winnebago Industries's net income of -$400K. Notably, Tesla's price-to-earnings ratio is 138.61x while Winnebago Industries's PE ratio is 196.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Tesla is 10.12x versus 0.38x for Winnebago Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.