RIVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a net margin of -42.85% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of --. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03% beat Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's return on equity of --.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 38.44%. On the other hand Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7384516.12%. Given that Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has higher upside potential than Rivian Automotive, analysts believe Faraday Future Intelligent Electric is more attractive than Rivian Automotive.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Faraday Future Intelligent Electric has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Faraday Future Intelligent Electric pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric quarterly revenues of --. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M is higher than Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's net income of --. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Faraday Future Intelligent Electric's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.19x versus 16.38x for Faraday Future Intelligent Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Motors has a net margin of -42.85% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -6.21%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03% beat General Motors's return on equity of 8.57%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 38.44%. On the other hand General Motors has an analysts' consensus of $62.34 which suggests that it could grow by 28.96%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than General Motors, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than General Motors.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Motors has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.563%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. General Motors offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors pays out 10.87% of its earnings as a dividend. General Motors's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than General Motors quarterly revenues of $47.7B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M is higher than General Motors's net income of -$3B. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while General Motors's PE ratio is 7.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.19x versus 0.29x for General Motors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lucid Group has a net margin of -42.85% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of -169.41%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03% beat Lucid Group's return on equity of -70.84%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 38.44%. On the other hand Lucid Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.43 which suggests that it could grow by 16.03%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Lucid Group, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Lucid Group.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lucid Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lucid Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lucid Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Lucid Group quarterly revenues of $234.5M. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M is lower than Lucid Group's net income of -$397.2M. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Lucid Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.19x versus 6.33x for Lucid Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -42.85% compared to Rivian Automotive's net margin of 9.17%. Rivian Automotive's return on equity of -65.03% beat Tesla's return on equity of 10.47%.

Rivian Automotive has a consensus price target of $14.88, signalling upside risk potential of 38.44%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $343.11 which suggests that it could grow by 37.25%. Given that Rivian Automotive has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Rivian Automotive is more attractive than Tesla.

Rivian Automotive has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.504, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 150.394%.

Rivian Automotive has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Rivian Automotive pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Rivian Automotive quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.7B. Rivian Automotive's net income of -$743M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Rivian Automotive's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 122.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Rivian Automotive is 2.19x versus 8.95x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.