WKSP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of --. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 295.68%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 23.46%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Worksport has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.762, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 176.173%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 0.91x versus 146.44x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of -196.68%. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 295.68%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $22.10 which suggests that it could grow by 474.03%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Worksport, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Worksport.

Worksport has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.056, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.58%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $22.5M. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is higher than Luminar Technologies's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 0.91x versus 1.62x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Miller Industries has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of 4.75%. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83%.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 295.68%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 60.99%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Worksport has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.565%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $221.9M. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 7.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 0.91x versus 0.39x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of -132.43% compared to Worksport's net margin of -214.6%. Worksport's return on equity of -87.2% beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Worksport has a consensus price target of $11.00, signalling upside risk potential of 295.68%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.54%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than SES AI.

Worksport has a beta of 2.005, which suggesting that the stock is 100.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Worksport has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Worksport pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Worksport quarterly revenues are $3.1M, which are smaller than SES AI quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Worksport's net income of -$4.1M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, Worksport's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Worksport is 0.91x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.