MLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyliion Holdings has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of --. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat Hyliion Holdings's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 57.72%. On the other hand Hyliion Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.79%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Hyliion Holdings, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Hyliion Holdings.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyliion Holdings has a beta of 2.236, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 123.597%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Hyliion Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyliion Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are larger than Hyliion Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is higher than Hyliion Holdings's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Hyliion Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus 143.72x for Hyliion Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -793.92%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 57.72%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $26.67 which suggests that it could grow by 428.05%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.736, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.614%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is lower than Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus 2.00x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -1693.38%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 57.72%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 127.38%. Given that SES AI has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe SES AI is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of $2M. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of 4.75% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -132.43%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83% beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $70.50, signalling upside risk potential of 57.72%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.58 which suggests that it could grow by 337.32%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, which suggesting that the stock is 4.092% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.874%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.7%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $221.9M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.14x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.41x versus 1.35x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.