MLR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Luminar Technologies has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -427.25%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 14.02% beat Luminar Technologies's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.46%. On the other hand Luminar Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $25.75 which suggests that it could grow by 768.47%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.681%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Luminar Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Luminar Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $225.7M, which are larger than Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues of $18.9M. Miller Industries's net income of $8.1M is higher than Luminar Technologies's net income of -$80.7M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.29x while Luminar Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.45x versus 1.42x for Luminar Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -214.6%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 14.02% beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.46%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of $1.33 which suggests that it could grow by 39.35%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than SES AI.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $225.7M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Miller Industries's net income of $8.1M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.29x while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.45x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strattec Security has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of 3.75%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 14.02% beat Strattec Security's return on equity of 8.82%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.46%. On the other hand Strattec Security has an analysts' consensus of $66.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.73%. Given that Miller Industries has higher upside potential than Strattec Security, analysts believe Miller Industries is more attractive than Strattec Security.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strattec Security has a beta of 1.392, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.206%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Strattec Security offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Strattec Security pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $225.7M, which are larger than Strattec Security quarterly revenues of $144.1M. Miller Industries's net income of $8.1M is higher than Strattec Security's net income of $5.4M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.29x while Strattec Security's PE ratio is 11.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.45x versus 0.42x for Strattec Security. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of 3.57% compared to Miller Industries's net margin of -199.13%. Miller Industries's return on equity of 14.02% beat Worksport's return on equity of -91.95%.

Miller Industries has a consensus price target of $68.00, signalling upside risk potential of 55.46%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $10.33 which suggests that it could grow by 247.92%. Given that Worksport has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Worksport is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Miller Industries has a beta of 1.241, which suggesting that the stock is 24.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.336%.

Miller Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.78%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Miller Industries pays 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Miller Industries quarterly revenues are $225.7M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Miller Industries's net income of $8.1M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Miller Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.29x while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Miller Industries is 0.45x versus 0.96x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.