LAZR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Miller Industries has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of 4.75%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 16.83%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 428.05%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $70.50 which suggests that it could grow by 57.72%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.736, which suggesting that the stock is 73.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.092%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $221.9M. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is higher than Miller Industries's net income of $10.5M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 8.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.00x versus 0.41x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of -1693.38%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 428.05%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of $1.00 which suggests that it could grow by 127.38%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than SES AI.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.736, which suggesting that the stock is 73.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of $2M. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is higher than SES AI's net income of -$34.5M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.00x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visteon has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of 12.99%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Visteon's return on equity of 22.69%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 428.05%. On the other hand Visteon has an analysts' consensus of $107.54 which suggests that it could grow by 33.46%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Visteon, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Visteon.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.736, which suggesting that the stock is 73.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visteon has a beta of 1.395, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.508%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Visteon offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Visteon pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are smaller than Visteon quarterly revenues of $939M. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is lower than Visteon's net income of $122M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Visteon's PE ratio is 8.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.00x versus 0.58x for Visteon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -793.92% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of -132.43%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Worksport's return on equity of -87.2%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $26.67, signalling upside risk potential of 428.05%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $1.58 which suggests that it could grow by 337.32%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Worksport, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Worksport.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 1.736, which suggesting that the stock is 73.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.109, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 110.874%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $15.5M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $3.1M. Luminar Technologies's net income of $27.4M is higher than Worksport's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 2.00x versus 1.35x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.