LAZR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Miller Industries has a net margin of -427.25% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of 3.57%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Miller Industries's return on equity of 14.02%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 768.47%. On the other hand Miller Industries has an analysts' consensus of $68.00 which suggests that it could grow by 55.46%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Miller Industries, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Miller Industries.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Miller Industries has a beta of 1.241, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.122%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Miller Industries offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries pays out 13.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Miller Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Miller Industries quarterly revenues of $225.7M. Luminar Technologies's net income of -$80.7M is lower than Miller Industries's net income of $8.1M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Miller Industries's PE ratio is 9.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 1.42x versus 0.45x for Miller Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SES AI has a net margin of -427.25% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of -214.6%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat SES AI's return on equity of --.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 768.47%. On the other hand SES AI has an analysts' consensus of $1.33 which suggests that it could grow by 39.35%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than SES AI, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than SES AI.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SES AI has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SES AI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SES AI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are larger than SES AI quarterly revenues of $5.8M. Luminar Technologies's net income of -$80.7M is lower than SES AI's net income of -$12.4M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SES AI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 1.42x versus -- for SES AI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -427.25% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of 2.12%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 768.47%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $301.56 which suggests that it could fall by -5.5%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Tesla.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Luminar Technologies's net income of -$80.7M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 175.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 1.42x versus 11.69x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Worksport has a net margin of -427.25% compared to Luminar Technologies's net margin of -199.13%. Luminar Technologies's return on equity of -- beat Worksport's return on equity of -91.95%.

Luminar Technologies has a consensus price target of $25.75, signalling upside risk potential of 768.47%. On the other hand Worksport has an analysts' consensus of $10.33 which suggests that it could grow by 225.97%. Given that Luminar Technologies has higher upside potential than Worksport, analysts believe Luminar Technologies is more attractive than Worksport.

Luminar Technologies has a beta of 2.007, which suggesting that the stock is 100.681% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Worksport has a beta of 2.003, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 100.336%.

Luminar Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Worksport offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Luminar Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Worksport pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Luminar Technologies quarterly revenues are $18.9M, which are larger than Worksport quarterly revenues of $2.2M. Luminar Technologies's net income of -$80.7M is lower than Worksport's net income of -$4.5M. Notably, Luminar Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Worksport's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Luminar Technologies is 1.42x versus 1.03x for Worksport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.