HAS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Hasbro's net margin of -2.1%. Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 20.74%.

Hasbro has a consensus price target of $76.34, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $36.50 which suggests that it could grow by 81.41%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Hasbro.

Hasbro has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 1.025, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.45%.

Hasbro has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Hasbro pays 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hasbro quarterly revenues are $887.1M, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $113.3M. Hasbro's net income of $98.6M is higher than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$2.4M. Notably, Hasbro's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 4.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hasbro is 2.20x versus 0.32x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Hasbro's net margin of -4.88%. Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Hasbro has a consensus price target of $76.34, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.58 which suggests that it could grow by 24.47%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Hasbro.

Hasbro has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.613, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.658%.

Hasbro has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hasbro pays 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hasbro quarterly revenues are $887.1M, which are larger than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Hasbro's net income of $98.6M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Hasbro's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hasbro is 2.20x versus 1.18x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PLBY Group has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Hasbro's net margin of -31.31%. Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13% beat PLBY Group's return on equity of -3855.97%.

Hasbro has a consensus price target of $76.34, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand PLBY Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.10 which suggests that it could grow by 32.91%. Given that PLBY Group has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe PLBY Group is more attractive than Hasbro.

Hasbro has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hasbro has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. PLBY Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hasbro pays 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend. PLBY Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hasbro quarterly revenues are $887.1M, which are larger than PLBY Group quarterly revenues of $28.9M. Hasbro's net income of $98.6M is higher than PLBY Group's net income of -$9M. Notably, Hasbro's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while PLBY Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hasbro is 2.20x versus 0.85x for PLBY Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of 11.12% compared to Hasbro's net margin of 2.12%. Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

Hasbro has a consensus price target of $76.34, signalling upside risk potential of 14.44%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -13.59%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than Tesla.

Hasbro has a beta of 0.542, which suggesting that the stock is 45.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.429, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 142.869%.

Hasbro has a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.2%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hasbro pays 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Hasbro quarterly revenues are $887.1M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. Hasbro's net income of $98.6M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, Hasbro's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.02x while Tesla's PE ratio is 190.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hasbro is 2.20x versus 12.69x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.