FNKO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro has a net margin of -14.46% compared to Funko's net margin of 11.12%. Funko's return on equity of -8.65% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 36.13%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.83%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $76.88 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Hasbro.

Funko has a beta of 0.773, which suggesting that the stock is 22.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.565, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.466%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $190.7M, which are smaller than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $887.1M. Funko's net income of -$27.6M is lower than Hasbro's net income of $98.6M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hasbro's PE ratio is 22.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.27x versus 2.24x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of -14.46% compared to Funko's net margin of 6.88%. Funko's return on equity of -8.65% beat Kontoor Brands's return on equity of 59.13%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.83%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands has an analysts' consensus of $78.83 which suggests that it could grow by 26.91%. Given that Kontoor Brands has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Kontoor Brands is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 0.773, which suggesting that the stock is 22.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands has a beta of 1.160, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.982%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kontoor Brands offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands pays out 45.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $190.7M, which are smaller than Kontoor Brands quarterly revenues of $622.9M. Funko's net income of -$27.6M is lower than Kontoor Brands's net income of $42.9M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kontoor Brands's PE ratio is 15.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.27x versus 1.34x for Kontoor Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -14.46% compared to Funko's net margin of -4.88%. Funko's return on equity of -8.65% beat Mattel's return on equity of 24.74%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.83%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $23.64 which suggests that it could grow by 25.75%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 0.773, which suggesting that the stock is 22.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.573%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $190.7M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $826.6M. Funko's net income of -$27.6M is higher than Mattel's net income of -$40.3M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.27x versus 1.18x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reynolds Consumer Products has a net margin of -14.46% compared to Funko's net margin of 3.79%. Funko's return on equity of -8.65% beat Reynolds Consumer Products's return on equity of 16.17%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $6.25, signalling upside risk potential of 21.83%. On the other hand Reynolds Consumer Products has an analysts' consensus of $26.25 which suggests that it could grow by 24.29%. Given that Reynolds Consumer Products has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Reynolds Consumer Products is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 0.773, which suggesting that the stock is 22.736% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reynolds Consumer Products has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.63%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reynolds Consumer Products offers a yield of 4.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Funko pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products pays out 54.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $190.7M, which are smaller than Reynolds Consumer Products quarterly revenues of $818M. Funko's net income of -$27.6M is lower than Reynolds Consumer Products's net income of $31M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reynolds Consumer Products's PE ratio is 13.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.27x versus 1.21x for Reynolds Consumer Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.