FNKO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Funko's net margin of 16.25%. Funko's return on equity of -10.28% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.64%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling downside risk potential of -13.79%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $42.33 which suggests that it could grow by 48.85%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 122.664%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko pays -0.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $292.8M, which are smaller than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $321.6M. Funko's net income of $4.3M is lower than Jakks Pacific's net income of $52.3M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 10.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.72x versus 0.45x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kontoor Brands has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Funko's net margin of 10.53%. Funko's return on equity of -10.28% beat Kontoor Brands's return on equity of 68.44%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling downside risk potential of -13.79%. On the other hand Kontoor Brands has an analysts' consensus of $94.43 which suggests that it could grow by 7.33%. Given that Kontoor Brands has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Kontoor Brands is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kontoor Brands has a beta of 1.206, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.595%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kontoor Brands offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Funko pays -0.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands pays out 47% of its earnings as a dividend. Kontoor Brands's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $292.8M, which are smaller than Kontoor Brands quarterly revenues of $670.2M. Funko's net income of $4.3M is lower than Kontoor Brands's net income of $70.5M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kontoor Brands's PE ratio is 19.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.72x versus 1.93x for Kontoor Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Funko's net margin of 20.2%. Funko's return on equity of -10.28% beat Mattel's return on equity of 26.12%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling downside risk potential of -13.79%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $24.08 which suggests that it could grow by 30.66%. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.754, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.641%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Funko pays -0.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Funko quarterly revenues are $292.8M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Funko's net income of $4.3M is lower than Mattel's net income of $372.4M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mattel's PE ratio is 11.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.72x versus 1.19x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Reynolds Consumer Products has a net margin of 1.48% compared to Funko's net margin of 9.45%. Funko's return on equity of -10.28% beat Reynolds Consumer Products's return on equity of 18.51%.

Funko has a consensus price target of $12.50, signalling downside risk potential of -13.79%. On the other hand Reynolds Consumer Products has an analysts' consensus of $32.78 which suggests that it could grow by 19.54%. Given that Reynolds Consumer Products has higher upside potential than Funko, analysts believe Reynolds Consumer Products is more attractive than Funko.

Funko has a beta of 1.165, which suggesting that the stock is 16.469% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Reynolds Consumer Products has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Funko has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Reynolds Consumer Products offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Funko pays -0.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products pays out 64.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Reynolds Consumer Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Funko quarterly revenues are $292.8M, which are smaller than Reynolds Consumer Products quarterly revenues of $910M. Funko's net income of $4.3M is lower than Reynolds Consumer Products's net income of $86M. Notably, Funko's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Reynolds Consumer Products's PE ratio is 15.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Funko is 0.72x versus 1.51x for Reynolds Consumer Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.