MAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Funko has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -0.51%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat Funko's return on equity of -6.35%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.09%. On the other hand Funko has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 38.5%. Given that Funko has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Funko is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Funko has a beta of 0.943, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.651%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Funko offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Funko pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Funko quarterly revenues of $293.7M. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than Funko's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while Funko's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.25x versus 0.36x for Funko. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hasbro has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -3.11%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 33.33%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.09%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $79.09 which suggests that it could grow by 33.38%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.327%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than Hasbro's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while Hasbro's PE ratio is 21.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.25x versus 2.01x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -6.97%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.09%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 75.87%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.673%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $130.7M. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 8.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.25x versus 0.39x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

O-I Glass has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -10.07%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat O-I Glass's return on equity of -6.66%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 30.09%. On the other hand O-I Glass has an analysts' consensus of $15.60 which suggests that it could grow by 39.54%. Given that O-I Glass has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe O-I Glass is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison O-I Glass has a beta of 1.203, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.339%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. O-I Glass offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. O-I Glass pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than O-I Glass quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than O-I Glass's net income of -$154M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.29x while O-I Glass's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.25x versus 0.27x for O-I Glass. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.