MAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -3.11%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 33.33%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $79.09 which suggests that it could grow by 31.34%. Given that Hasbro has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Hasbro is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.327%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than Hasbro's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.61x while Hasbro's PE ratio is 21.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.28x versus 2.04x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jakks Pacific has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -6.97%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Jakks Pacific has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 72%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.673%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jakks Pacific offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jakks Pacific pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues of $130.7M. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.61x while Jakks Pacific's PE ratio is 8.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.28x versus 0.40x for Jakks Pacific. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PLBY Group has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -15.06%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat PLBY Group's return on equity of -596.01%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand PLBY Group has an analysts' consensus of $1.95 which suggests that it could grow by 66.67%. Given that PLBY Group has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe PLBY Group is more attractive than Mattel.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. PLBY Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PLBY Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than PLBY Group quarterly revenues of $83.3M. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than PLBY Group's net income of -$12.5M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.61x while PLBY Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.28x versus 0.60x for PLBY Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SRM Entertainment has a net margin of 8.56% compared to Mattel's net margin of -128.81%. Mattel's return on equity of 25.26% beat SRM Entertainment's return on equity of -112.23%.

Mattel has a consensus price target of $25.58, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand SRM Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mattel has higher upside potential than SRM Entertainment, analysts believe Mattel is more attractive than SRM Entertainment.

Mattel has a beta of 0.655, which suggesting that the stock is 34.545% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRM Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Mattel has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SRM Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mattel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRM Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mattel quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than SRM Entertainment quarterly revenues of $876.4K. Mattel's net income of $140.9M is higher than SRM Entertainment's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Mattel's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.61x while SRM Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mattel is 1.28x versus 0.88x for SRM Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.