SYY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chefs' Warehouse has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of 2.32%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat The Chefs' Warehouse's return on equity of 11.64%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $83.68, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand The Chefs' Warehouse has an analysts' consensus of $69.75 which suggests that it could grow by 32.96%. Given that The Chefs' Warehouse has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe The Chefs' Warehouse is more attractive than Sysco.

Sysco has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chefs' Warehouse has a beta of 2.278, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.801%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. The Chefs' Warehouse offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chefs' Warehouse pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than The Chefs' Warehouse quarterly revenues of $1B. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than The Chefs' Warehouse's net income of $23.9M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while The Chefs' Warehouse's PE ratio is 40.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.61x for The Chefs' Warehouse. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Performance Food Group has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of 0.27%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat Performance Food Group's return on equity of 9.49%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $83.68, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand Performance Food Group has an analysts' consensus of $100.77 which suggests that it could grow by 32.9%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Sysco.

Sysco has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.405, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.459%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. Performance Food Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Performance Food Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than Performance Food Group quarterly revenues of $15.6B. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than Performance Food Group's net income of $42.4M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while Performance Food Group's PE ratio is 30.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.20x for Performance Food Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of -0.04%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $83.68, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $29.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.4%. Given that Sysco has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Sysco is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

Sysco has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.177%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 2.02% compared to Sysco's net margin of 0.7%. Sysco's return on equity of 90.07% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 10.41%.

Sysco has a consensus price target of $83.68, signalling upside risk potential of 14.2%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $80.26 which suggests that it could grow by 22.56%. Given that US Foods Holding has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe US Foods Holding is more attractive than Sysco.

Sysco has a beta of 1.117, which suggesting that the stock is 11.656% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.13%.

Sysco has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.77%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sysco pays 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sysco quarterly revenues are $20.2B, which are larger than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Sysco's net income of $406M is higher than US Foods Holding's net income of $66M. Notably, Sysco's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.84x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 32.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sysco is 0.45x versus 0.42x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.