PFGC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calavo Growers has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of -0.41%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 10.59% beat Calavo Growers's return on equity of -4.23%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $98.65, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand Calavo Growers has an analysts' consensus of $34.67 which suggests that it could grow by 45.35%. Given that Calavo Growers has higher upside potential than Performance Food Group, analysts believe Calavo Growers is more attractive than Performance Food Group.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.433, which suggesting that the stock is 43.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.592, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.81%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calavo Growers offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out -125.04% of its earnings as a dividend.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are larger than Calavo Growers quarterly revenues of $179.6M. Performance Food Group's net income of $108M is higher than Calavo Growers's net income of -$732K. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.65x while Calavo Growers's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.23x versus 0.42x for Calavo Growers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Amcon Distributing has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 0.17%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 10.59% beat Amcon Distributing's return on equity of 4.01%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $98.65, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand Amcon Distributing has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Amcon Distributing, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Amcon Distributing.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.433, which suggesting that the stock is 43.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Amcon Distributing has a beta of 0.584, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.554%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Amcon Distributing offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing pays out 14.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Amcon Distributing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are larger than Amcon Distributing quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Performance Food Group's net income of $108M is higher than Amcon Distributing's net income of $1.2M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.65x while Amcon Distributing's PE ratio is 18.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.23x versus 0.03x for Amcon Distributing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 2.39%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 10.59% beat Sysco's return on equity of 89.41%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $98.65, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $85.01 which suggests that it could grow by 13.58%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than Sysco.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.433, which suggesting that the stock is 43.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.575%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $20.5B. Performance Food Group's net income of $108M is lower than Sysco's net income of $490M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.65x while Sysco's PE ratio is 19.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.23x versus 0.47x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 0.7% compared to Performance Food Group's net margin of 1.52%. Performance Food Group's return on equity of 10.59% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 12.04%.

Performance Food Group has a consensus price target of $98.65, signalling upside risk potential of 15%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $76.95 which suggests that it could grow by 12.8%. Given that Performance Food Group has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Performance Food Group is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Performance Food Group has a beta of 1.433, which suggesting that the stock is 43.281% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.673, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.267%.

Performance Food Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Performance Food Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out 1.38% of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Performance Food Group quarterly revenues are $15.4B, which are larger than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.7B. Performance Food Group's net income of $108M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $148M. Notably, Performance Food Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.65x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 29.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Performance Food Group is 0.23x versus 0.45x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.