AVO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Calavo Growers has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 2.86%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat Calavo Growers's return on equity of 4.71%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 68.15%. On the other hand Calavo Growers has an analysts' consensus of $33.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.64%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Calavo Growers, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Calavo Growers.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Calavo Growers has a beta of 0.575, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.488%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Calavo Growers offers a yield of 2.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Calavo Growers pays out -829.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are larger than Calavo Growers quarterly revenues of $154.4M. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is lower than Calavo Growers's net income of $4.4M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while Calavo Growers's PE ratio is 42.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.55x versus 0.60x for Calavo Growers. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sysco has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 2.02%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat Sysco's return on equity of 90.07%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 68.15%. On the other hand Sysco has an analysts' consensus of $83.68 which suggests that it could grow by 14.2%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Sysco, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Sysco.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sysco has a beta of 1.117, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.656%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sysco offers a yield of 2.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco pays out 51.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Sysco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are smaller than Sysco quarterly revenues of $20.2B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is lower than Sysco's net income of $406M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while Sysco's PE ratio is 18.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.55x versus 0.45x for Sysco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Natural Foods has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of -0.04%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat United Natural Foods's return on equity of -4.96%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 68.15%. On the other hand United Natural Foods has an analysts' consensus of $29.78 which suggests that it could grow by 11.4%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than United Natural Foods, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than United Natural Foods.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Natural Foods has a beta of 0.558, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.177%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United Natural Foods offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United Natural Foods pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are smaller than United Natural Foods quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is higher than United Natural Foods's net income of -$3M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while United Natural Foods's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.55x versus 0.05x for United Natural Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Foods Holding has a net margin of 1.17% compared to Mission Produce's net margin of 0.7%. Mission Produce's return on equity of 7.29% beat US Foods Holding's return on equity of 10.41%.

Mission Produce has a consensus price target of $17.00, signalling upside risk potential of 68.15%. On the other hand US Foods Holding has an analysts' consensus of $80.26 which suggests that it could grow by 22.56%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than US Foods Holding, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than US Foods Holding.

Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Foods Holding has a beta of 1.651, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.13%.

Mission Produce has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Foods Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mission Produce pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Foods Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mission Produce quarterly revenues are $334.2M, which are smaller than US Foods Holding quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Mission Produce's net income of $3.9M is lower than US Foods Holding's net income of $66M. Notably, Mission Produce's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.05x while US Foods Holding's PE ratio is 32.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mission Produce is 0.55x versus 0.42x for US Foods Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.