SNA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hyster Yale has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 0.97%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Hyster Yale's return on equity of 30.13%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $331.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand Hyster Yale has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 93.7%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.316, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.55%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Hyster Yale offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale pays out 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Hyster Yale quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than Hyster Yale's net income of $10.3M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.92x while Hyster Yale's PE ratio is 4.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.75x versus 0.15x for Hyster Yale. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kennametal has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 3.72%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $331.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.25 which suggests that it could grow by 21.45%. Given that Kennametal has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Kennametal is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.414%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Kennametal offers a yield of 4.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.92x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.75x versus 0.72x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 13.72%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $331.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $230.11 which suggests that it could grow by 30.07%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.912%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.92x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 21.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.75x versus 2.52x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Middleby has a net margin of 21.53% compared to Snap-on's net margin of 11.08%. Snap-on's return on equity of 19.71% beat The Middleby's return on equity of 12.44%.

Snap-on has a consensus price target of $331.69, signalling upside risk potential of 0.55%. On the other hand The Middleby has an analysts' consensus of $178.33 which suggests that it could grow by 35.52%. Given that The Middleby has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe The Middleby is more attractive than Snap-on.

Snap-on has a beta of 0.840, which suggesting that the stock is 15.982% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Middleby has a beta of 1.444, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.404%.

Snap-on has a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.43%. The Middleby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Snap-on pays 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Middleby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Snap-on quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than The Middleby quarterly revenues of $1B. Snap-on's net income of $258.1M is higher than The Middleby's net income of $112.3M. Notably, Snap-on's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.92x while The Middleby's PE ratio is 16.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Snap-on is 3.75x versus 1.84x for The Middleby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.