CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PACCAR has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 11.03%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $383.49, signalling upside risk potential of 18.57%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $113.22 which suggests that it could grow by 15.31%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than PACCAR.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.71%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Cummins's net income of $418M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 12.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus 1.54x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

REV Group has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 3.47%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat REV Group's return on equity of 21.81%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $383.49, signalling upside risk potential of 18.57%. On the other hand REV Group has an analysts' consensus of $34.88 which suggests that it could grow by 4.64%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than REV Group, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than REV Group.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison REV Group has a beta of 1.568, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.837%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. REV Group offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. REV Group pays out 74.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than REV Group quarterly revenues of $525.1M. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than REV Group's net income of $18.2M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while REV Group's PE ratio is 18.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus 0.76x for REV Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of 8.21%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.16%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $383.49, signalling upside risk potential of 18.57%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $215.12 which suggests that it could grow by 14.62%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.306, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.649%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $212M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 31.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus 3.16x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 4.95% compared to Cummins's net margin of -0.25%. Cummins's return on equity of 37.07% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -69.69%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $383.49, signalling upside risk potential of 18.57%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 52.33%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.012, which suggesting that the stock is 1.2% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.641, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.094%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.21%. Wabash National offers a yield of 3.58% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cummins pays 24.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.4B, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $416.8M. Cummins's net income of $418M is higher than Wabash National's net income of -$1M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.48x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.32x versus 0.26x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.