CMI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Emerson Electric has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of 21.56%. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Emerson Electric's return on equity of 7.34%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $380.48, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand Emerson Electric has an analysts' consensus of $140.37 which suggests that it could grow by 13.27%. Given that Emerson Electric has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Emerson Electric is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.96400000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Emerson Electric has a beta of 1.348, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.814%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Emerson Electric offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.53 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric pays out 61.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Emerson Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Emerson Electric quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Cummins's net income of $809M is lower than Emerson Electric's net income of $996M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.13x while Emerson Electric's PE ratio is 36.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.43x versus 4.07x for Emerson Electric. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Greenbrier Companies has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of 5.85%. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Greenbrier Companies's return on equity of 10.55%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $380.48, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand Greenbrier Companies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.48%. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Greenbrier Companies, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Greenbrier Companies.

Cummins has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.96400000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Greenbrier Companies has a beta of 1.543, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.295%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Greenbrier Companies offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Greenbrier Companies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Greenbrier Companies quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Cummins's net income of $809M is higher than Greenbrier Companies's net income of $61.6M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.13x while Greenbrier Companies's PE ratio is 12.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.43x versus 0.56x for Greenbrier Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hydrogen Engine Center has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of --. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Hydrogen Engine Center's return on equity of --.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $380.48, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand Hydrogen Engine Center has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cummins has higher upside potential than Hydrogen Engine Center, analysts believe Cummins is more attractive than Hydrogen Engine Center.

Cummins has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.96400000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hydrogen Engine Center has a beta of 21.829, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2082.923%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Hydrogen Engine Center offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Hydrogen Engine Center pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Hydrogen Engine Center quarterly revenues of --. Cummins's net income of $809M is higher than Hydrogen Engine Center's net income of --. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.13x while Hydrogen Engine Center's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.43x versus -- for Hydrogen Engine Center. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 9.57% compared to Cummins's net margin of -71.15%. Cummins's return on equity of 19.56% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -49.14%.

Cummins has a consensus price target of $380.48, signalling upside risk potential of 9.14%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.51%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than Cummins.

Cummins has a beta of 1.010, which suggesting that the stock is 0.96400000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.579, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.891%.

Cummins has a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.97%. Wabash National offers a yield of 1.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Cummins pays 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out 6.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Cummins quarterly revenues are $8.5B, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $464M. Cummins's net income of $809M is higher than Wabash National's net income of -$330.2M. Notably, Cummins's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.13x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cummins is 1.43x versus 0.37x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.