PCAR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Oshkosh has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 4.85%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Oshkosh's return on equity of 15.17%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Oshkosh has an analysts' consensus of $108.69 which suggests that it could grow by 9.58%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 4.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oshkosh has a beta of 1.408, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.847%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Oshkosh offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh pays out 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Oshkosh quarterly revenues of $2.3B. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Oshkosh's net income of $112.2M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while Oshkosh's PE ratio is 10.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.53x versus 0.62x for Oshkosh. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -0.7%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of 0.18%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 47.76%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 4.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.945, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.454%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $204.6M. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$1.4M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is 1,049.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.53x versus 0.46x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wabash National has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of 60.63%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Wabash National's return on equity of -18.83%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Wabash National has an analysts' consensus of $11.75 which suggests that it could grow by 35.53%. Given that Wabash National has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Wabash National is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 4.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wabash National has a beta of 1.614, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.353%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Wabash National offers a yield of 4.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Wabash National pays out -5.2% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Wabash National quarterly revenues of $380.9M. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Wabash National's net income of $230.9M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while Wabash National's PE ratio is 5.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.53x versus 0.21x for Wabash National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 6.79% compared to PACCAR's net margin of -173.26%. PACCAR's return on equity of 19.56% beat Xos's return on equity of -104.41%.

PACCAR has a consensus price target of $101.13, signalling upside risk potential of 7.76%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.00 which suggests that it could grow by 81.27%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than PACCAR.

PACCAR has a beta of 0.950, which suggesting that the stock is 4.998% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

PACCAR has a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.34%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. PACCAR pays 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

PACCAR quarterly revenues are $7.4B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $5.9M. PACCAR's net income of $505.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.2M. Notably, PACCAR's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.22x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for PACCAR is 1.53x versus 0.54x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.