OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cummins has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 9.57%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat Cummins's return on equity of 19.56%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.59%. On the other hand Cummins has an analysts' consensus of $380.48 which suggests that it could grow by 7.37%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than Cummins, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than Cummins.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cummins has a beta of 1.010, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.96400000000001%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Cummins offers a yield of 1.94% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.82 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Cummins pays out 125.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Cummins's is not.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than Cummins quarterly revenues of $8.5B. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is lower than Cummins's net income of $809M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.15x while Cummins's PE ratio is 23.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 1.45x for Cummins. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PACCAR has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 11.8%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 27.64%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.59%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $115.35 which suggests that it could grow by 9.96%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.304%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 33.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $8.2B. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $972.1M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.15x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 11.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 1.58x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 1.61%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.51%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.59%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 27.44%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.660, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.048%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 1.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out 109.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but The Shyft Group's is not.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $194.1M. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of $3.1M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.15x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 0.52x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 6.58% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -66.57%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.78% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $129.85, signalling upside risk potential of 26.59%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $9.75 which suggests that it could grow by 173.11%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.215, which suggesting that the stock is 21.495% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.7B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Oshkosh's net income of $180.3M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.15x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.59x versus 0.40x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.