OSK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PACCAR has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 11.03%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat PACCAR's return on equity of 24.02%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $123.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.35%. On the other hand PACCAR has an analysts' consensus of $111.72 which suggests that it could grow by 20.96%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than PACCAR, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than PACCAR.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PACCAR has a beta of 0.956, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.355%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. PACCAR offers a yield of 1.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. PACCAR pays out 54.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are smaller than PACCAR quarterly revenues of $7.9B. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is lower than PACCAR's net income of $872M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.37x while PACCAR's PE ratio is 11.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 1.44x for PACCAR. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Shyft Group has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -1.69%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat The Shyft Group's return on equity of -1.12%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $123.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.35%. On the other hand The Shyft Group has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 97.45%. Given that The Shyft Group has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe The Shyft Group is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Shyft Group has a beta of 1.831, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.148%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. The Shyft Group offers a yield of 2.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. The Shyft Group pays out -249.59% of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than The Shyft Group quarterly revenues of $201.4M. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is higher than The Shyft Group's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.37x while The Shyft Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 0.34x for The Shyft Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of 8.21%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's return on equity of 10.16%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $123.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.35%. On the other hand Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $215.12 which suggests that it could grow by 23.93%. Given that Oshkosh has higher upside potential than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies, analysts believe Oshkosh is more attractive than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies has a beta of 1.142, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.234%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies pays out 13.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is lower than Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's net income of $212M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.37x while Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies's PE ratio is 28.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 2.92x for Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xos has a net margin of 5.89% compared to Oshkosh's net margin of -66.57%. Oshkosh's return on equity of 17.29% beat Xos's return on equity of -80.19%.

Oshkosh has a consensus price target of $123.25, signalling upside risk potential of 42.35%. On the other hand Xos has an analysts' consensus of $6.33 which suggests that it could grow by 102.34%. Given that Xos has higher upside potential than Oshkosh, analysts believe Xos is more attractive than Oshkosh.

Oshkosh has a beta of 1.260, which suggesting that the stock is 26.023% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Oshkosh has a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Xos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Oshkosh pays 17.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Xos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Oshkosh's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Oshkosh quarterly revenues are $2.6B, which are larger than Xos quarterly revenues of $15.8M. Oshkosh's net income of $153.1M is higher than Xos's net income of -$10.5M. Notably, Oshkosh's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.37x while Xos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Oshkosh is 0.53x versus 0.42x for Xos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.