HY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kennametal has a net margin of 0.97% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 3.72%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 30.13% beat Kennametal's return on equity of 7.4%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $72.50, signalling upside risk potential of 92.36%. On the other hand Kennametal has an analysts' consensus of $22.25 which suggests that it could grow by 17.35%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Kennametal, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Kennametal.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.316, which suggesting that the stock is 31.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kennametal has a beta of 1.554, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.414%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Kennametal offers a yield of 4.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Kennametal pays out 58.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Kennametal quarterly revenues of $482.1M. Hyster Yale's net income of $10.3M is lower than Kennametal's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.68x while Kennametal's PE ratio is 15.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.15x versus 0.74x for Kennametal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 0.97% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 13.72%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 30.13% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 35.33%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $72.50, signalling upside risk potential of 92.36%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $230.11 which suggests that it could grow by 27.04%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.316, which suggesting that the stock is 31.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.912%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $1B. Hyster Yale's net income of $10.3M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $140.2M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.68x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 22.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.15x versus 2.58x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 0.97% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 15.38%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 30.13% beat Nordson's return on equity of 15.96%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $72.50, signalling upside risk potential of 92.36%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $243.29 which suggests that it could grow by 31.11%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Nordson.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.316, which suggesting that the stock is 31.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.960, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.982%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $615.4M. Hyster Yale's net income of $10.3M is lower than Nordson's net income of $94.7M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.68x while Nordson's PE ratio is 23.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.15x versus 4.00x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 0.97% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of -0.16%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 30.13% beat Terex's return on equity of 18.59%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of $72.50, signalling upside risk potential of 92.36%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $45.27 which suggests that it could grow by 29.5%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Terex, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Terex.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.316, which suggesting that the stock is 31.55% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.292%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.72%. Terex offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hyster Yale pays 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hyster Yale's net income of $10.3M is higher than Terex's net income of -$2M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.68x while Terex's PE ratio is 7.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.15x versus 0.46x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.