HY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Superconductor has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 8.97%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 35.93% beat American Superconductor's return on equity of -0.69%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.41%. On the other hand American Superconductor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 5.77%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than American Superconductor, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than American Superconductor.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Superconductor has a beta of 2.280, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.972%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. American Superconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hyster Yale pays 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. American Superconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than American Superconductor quarterly revenues of $54.5M. Hyster Yale's net income of $17.2M is higher than American Superconductor's net income of $4.9M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while American Superconductor's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.21x versus 5.51x for American Superconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 10.24%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 35.93% beat Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.41%. On the other hand Lincoln Electric Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $222.67 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.184, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.42%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Lincoln Electric Holdings offers a yield of 1.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Hyster Yale pays 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays out 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues of $983.8M. Hyster Yale's net income of $17.2M is lower than Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Lincoln Electric Holdings's PE ratio is 22.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.21x versus 2.65x for Lincoln Electric Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 16.41%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 35.93% beat Nordson's return on equity of 16.81%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.41%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $257.29 which suggests that it could grow by 23.96%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Nordson, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Nordson.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.461%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Hyster Yale pays 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $744.5M. Hyster Yale's net income of $17.2M is lower than Nordson's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Nordson's PE ratio is 25.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.21x versus 4.45x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 1.69% compared to Hyster Yale's net margin of 7.26%. Hyster Yale's return on equity of 35.93% beat Terex's return on equity of 26.74%.

Hyster Yale has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 42.41%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $55.45 which suggests that it could grow by 21.21%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Terex, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Terex.

Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.266, which suggesting that the stock is 26.582% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.227%.

Hyster Yale has a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Terex offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hyster Yale pays 17.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 8.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hyster Yale quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Hyster Yale's net income of $17.2M is lower than Terex's net income of $88M. Notably, Hyster Yale's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.72x while Terex's PE ratio is 6.68x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hyster Yale is 0.21x versus 0.61x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.