LECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 14.36%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79% beat Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 24.44%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $209.89, signalling upside risk potential of 4.81%. On the other hand Enerpac Tool Group has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.83%. Given that Enerpac Tool Group has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Enerpac Tool Group is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.558%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Enerpac Tool Group offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Enerpac Tool Group quarterly revenues of $145.5M. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M is higher than Enerpac Tool Group's net income of $20.9M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.69x while Enerpac Tool Group's PE ratio is 24.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.83x versus 3.85x for Enerpac Tool Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hyster Yale has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 0.95%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79% beat Hyster Yale's return on equity of 20.01%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $209.89, signalling upside risk potential of 4.81%. On the other hand Hyster Yale has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 42.49%. Given that Hyster Yale has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Hyster Yale is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyster Yale has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.33%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Hyster Yale offers a yield of 3.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyster Yale pays out 16.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Hyster Yale quarterly revenues of $910.4M. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M is higher than Hyster Yale's net income of $8.6M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.69x while Hyster Yale's PE ratio is 7.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.83x versus 0.17x for Hyster Yale. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snap-on has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 21.08%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79% beat Snap-on's return on equity of 18.95%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $209.89, signalling upside risk potential of 4.81%. On the other hand Snap-on has an analysts' consensus of $321.39 which suggests that it could grow by 4.59%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Snap-on, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Snap-on.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snap-on has a beta of 0.781, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.916%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Snap-on offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.14 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Snap-on pays out 38.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Snap-on quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M is lower than Snap-on's net income of $240.5M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.69x while Snap-on's PE ratio is 16.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.83x versus 3.52x for Snap-on. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Terex has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 1.71%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 34.79% beat Terex's return on equity of 13.48%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $209.89, signalling upside risk potential of 4.81%. On the other hand Terex has an analysts' consensus of $49.95 which suggests that it could grow by 11.31%. Given that Terex has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Terex is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.196, which suggesting that the stock is 19.616% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Terex has a beta of 1.605, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.48%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.46%. Terex offers a yield of 1.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 34.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Terex pays out 13.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $1B, which are smaller than Terex quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $118.5M is higher than Terex's net income of $21M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.69x while Terex's PE ratio is 12.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.83x versus 0.60x for Terex. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.