LECO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bonal International has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of --. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15% beat Bonal International's return on equity of --.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $222.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Bonal International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Bonal International, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Bonal International.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bonal International has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.708%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Bonal International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Bonal International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $983.8M, which are larger than Bonal International quarterly revenues of --. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M is higher than Bonal International's net income of --. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.37x while Bonal International's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.67x versus -- for Bonal International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Illinois Tool Works has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 29.25%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15% beat Illinois Tool Works's return on equity of 112.23%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $222.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Illinois Tool Works has an analysts' consensus of $262.58 which suggests that it could grow by 4.08%. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Illinois Tool Works, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Illinois Tool Works.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Illinois Tool Works has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.759%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Illinois Tool Works offers a yield of 2.29% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Illinois Tool Works pays out 54.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $983.8M, which are smaller than Illinois Tool Works quarterly revenues of $4B. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M is lower than Illinois Tool Works's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.37x while Illinois Tool Works's PE ratio is 21.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.67x versus 4.76x for Illinois Tool Works. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nordson has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 16.41%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15% beat Nordson's return on equity of 16.81%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $222.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Nordson has an analysts' consensus of $257.29 which suggests that it could grow by 22.96%. Given that Nordson has higher upside potential than Lincoln Electric Holdings, analysts believe Nordson is more attractive than Lincoln Electric Holdings.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nordson has a beta of 0.945, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.461%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Nordson offers a yield of 1.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.78 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Nordson pays out 34.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $983.8M, which are larger than Nordson quarterly revenues of $744.5M. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M is lower than Nordson's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.37x while Nordson's PE ratio is 25.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.67x versus 4.48x for Nordson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Taylor Devices has a net margin of 10.24% compared to Lincoln Electric Holdings's net margin of 20.49%. Lincoln Electric Holdings's return on equity of 37.15% beat Taylor Devices's return on equity of 17.62%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a consensus price target of $222.67, signalling upside risk potential of 18.78%. On the other hand Taylor Devices has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Lincoln Electric Holdings has higher upside potential than Taylor Devices, analysts believe Lincoln Electric Holdings is more attractive than Taylor Devices.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a beta of 1.184, which suggesting that the stock is 18.42% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Taylor Devices has a beta of 1.063, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.292%.

Lincoln Electric Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.54%. Taylor Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lincoln Electric Holdings pays 27.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Taylor Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln Electric Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lincoln Electric Holdings quarterly revenues are $983.8M, which are larger than Taylor Devices quarterly revenues of $12.1M. Lincoln Electric Holdings's net income of $100.8M is higher than Taylor Devices's net income of $2.5M. Notably, Lincoln Electric Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.37x while Taylor Devices's PE ratio is 14.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lincoln Electric Holdings is 2.67x versus 3.07x for Taylor Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.