LMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 8.13%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $522.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $291.14 which suggests that it could grow by 7.05%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.059% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 18.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.54x versus 1.54x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 19.91%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $522.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $221.91 which suggests that it could grow by 11.83%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.059% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.54x versus 5.44x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 8.2%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $522.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $254.81 which suggests that it could grow by 17.82%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.059% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.488%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 27.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.54x versus 1.93x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 9.53% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 7.56%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $522.49, signalling upside risk potential of 11.93%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $139.24 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, which suggesting that the stock is 61.059% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. RTX offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $18B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B is higher than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.16x while RTX's PE ratio is 35.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.54x versus 2.01x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.