LMT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 7.97%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $595.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $321.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.63%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.532%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.66x versus 1.59x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 18.82%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 24.49%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $595.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $210.71 which suggests that it could grow by 23.89%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.637%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 29.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.66x versus 2.44x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 7.33%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $595.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.51 which suggests that it could grow by 16.1%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than RTX.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.125%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. RTX offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is higher than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.66x versus 1.98x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Textron has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Lockheed Martin's net margin of 6.51%. Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37% beat Textron's return on equity of 12.66%.

Lockheed Martin has a consensus price target of $595.55, signalling upside risk potential of 21.8%. On the other hand Textron has an analysts' consensus of $97.60 which suggests that it could grow by 25.84%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, which suggesting that the stock is 53.55% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Textron has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.536%.

Lockheed Martin has a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.61%. Textron offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Lockheed Martin pays 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron pays out 1.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues are $17.1B, which are larger than Textron quarterly revenues of $3.4B. Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B is higher than Textron's net income of $223M. Notably, Lockheed Martin's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.70x while Textron's PE ratio is 16.92x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lockheed Martin is 1.66x versus 1.07x for Textron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.