RTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 7.56% compared to RTX's net margin of 8.13%. RTX's return on equity of 7.4% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $142.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $294.09 which suggests that it could grow by 5.3%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.461, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.91%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.95x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.41x versus 1.58x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 7.56% compared to RTX's net margin of 19.91%. RTX's return on equity of 7.4% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $142.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $244.48 which suggests that it could grow by 3.36%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.852%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.95x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 36.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.41x versus 6.49x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 7.56% compared to RTX's net margin of 7.52%. RTX's return on equity of 7.4% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 8.41%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $142.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $261.74 which suggests that it could grow by 5.64%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.743, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.701%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.1B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $386M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.95x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 29.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.41x versus 2.22x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 7.56% compared to RTX's net margin of 9.53%. RTX's return on equity of 7.4% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $142.61, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $527.76 which suggests that it could grow by 13%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.629, which suggesting that the stock is 37.116% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.292, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.819%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.76%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.3B, which are larger than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 42.95x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.41x versus 1.55x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.