RTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 8.61%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.89%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.395%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.21x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.26x versus 1.56x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 17.57%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $226.46 which suggests that it could grow by 6.76%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.192, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.166%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.21x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 35.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.26x versus 5.07x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 8.2%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $257.58 which suggests that it could grow by 21.18%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.218%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.21x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 27.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.26x versus 1.90x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 6.85% compared to RTX's net margin of 2.83%. RTX's return on equity of 7.72% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $143.33, signalling upside risk potential of 5.66%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $526.94 which suggests that it could grow by 19.2%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.687% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. RTX pays 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

RTX quarterly revenues are $21.6B, which are larger than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.21x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 2.26x versus 1.49x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.