RTX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 7.33% compared to RTX's net margin of 7.97%. RTX's return on equity of 7.41% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $135.51, signalling upside risk potential of 16.1%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $321.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.63%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.532%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. RTX pays 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.1B, which are larger than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.98x versus 1.59x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 7.33% compared to RTX's net margin of 18.82%. RTX's return on equity of 7.41% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 24.49%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $135.51, signalling upside risk potential of 16.1%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $210.71 which suggests that it could grow by 23.89%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.637%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. RTX pays 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 6.21% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.1B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.8B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 29.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.98x versus 2.44x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 7.33% compared to RTX's net margin of 7.56%. RTX's return on equity of 7.41% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $135.51, signalling upside risk potential of 16.1%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $277.35 which suggests that it could grow by 30.6%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.236%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share. RTX pays 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.1B, which are larger than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.3B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is higher than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 33.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.98x versus 1.91x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 7.33% compared to RTX's net margin of 9.49%. RTX's return on equity of 7.41% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

RTX has a consensus price target of $135.51, signalling upside risk potential of 16.1%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $595.55 which suggests that it could grow by 21.8%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than RTX.

RTX has a beta of 0.829, which suggesting that the stock is 17.125% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.55%.

RTX has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.13%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. RTX pays 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

RTX quarterly revenues are $20.1B, which are larger than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. RTX's net income of $1.5B is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, RTX's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.35x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 17.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for RTX is 1.98x versus 1.66x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.