GE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Columbus McKinnon has a net margin of 19.91% compared to GE Aerospace's net margin of 1.69%. GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36% beat Columbus McKinnon's return on equity of 1.06%.

GE Aerospace has a consensus price target of $223.74, signalling upside risk potential of 7.09%. On the other hand Columbus McKinnon has an analysts' consensus of $30.25 which suggests that it could grow by 96.94%. Given that Columbus McKinnon has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Columbus McKinnon is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Columbus McKinnon has a beta of 1.334, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.447%.

GE Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Columbus McKinnon offers a yield of 1.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. GE Aerospace pays 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Columbus McKinnon pays out 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GE Aerospace quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are larger than Columbus McKinnon quarterly revenues of $234.1M. GE Aerospace's net income of $2B is higher than Columbus McKinnon's net income of $4M. Notably, GE Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Columbus McKinnon's PE ratio is 46.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Aerospace is 5.73x versus 0.45x for Columbus McKinnon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

General Dynamics has a net margin of 19.91% compared to GE Aerospace's net margin of 8.13%. GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

GE Aerospace has a consensus price target of $223.74, signalling upside risk potential of 7.09%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $292.42 which suggests that it could grow by 7.45%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.491, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.852%.

GE Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. GE Aerospace pays 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GE Aerospace quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. GE Aerospace's net income of $2B is higher than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, GE Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 18.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Aerospace is 5.73x versus 1.54x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 19.91% compared to GE Aerospace's net margin of 9.53%. GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

GE Aerospace has a consensus price target of $223.74, signalling upside risk potential of 7.09%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.53 which suggests that it could grow by 11.02%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.293, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.689%.

GE Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. GE Aerospace pays 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GE Aerospace quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. GE Aerospace's net income of $2B is higher than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, GE Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Aerospace is 5.73x versus 1.56x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 19.91% compared to GE Aerospace's net margin of 7.56%. GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

GE Aerospace has a consensus price target of $223.74, signalling upside risk potential of 7.09%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $137.93 which suggests that it could grow by 7.26%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.312, which suggesting that the stock is 31.227% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.563%.

GE Aerospace has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.71%. RTX offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. GE Aerospace pays 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

GE Aerospace quarterly revenues are $9.9B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. GE Aerospace's net income of $2B is higher than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, GE Aerospace's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.49x while RTX's PE ratio is 37.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GE Aerospace is 5.73x versus 2.12x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.