LHX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 7.56% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 7.97%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 16.9%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $277.35, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $321.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.63%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than General Dynamics.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.236% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.595, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.532%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 43.08% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $11.7B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $930M. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.91x versus 1.59x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 7.56% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 9.49%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 92.37%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $277.35, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $595.55 which suggests that it could grow by 21.8%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.236% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.465, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.55%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 44.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $17.1B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.6B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 17.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.91x versus 1.66x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northrop Grumman has a net margin of 7.56% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 10.26%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4% beat Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 16.05%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $277.35, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand Northrop Grumman has an analysts' consensus of $560.36 which suggests that it could grow by 18.89%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Northrop Grumman, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Northrop Grumman.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.236% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.334, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 66.598%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. Northrop Grumman offers a yield of 1.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman pays out 54.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues of $10B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M is lower than Northrop Grumman's net income of $1B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while Northrop Grumman's PE ratio is 29.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.91x versus 1.71x for Northrop Grumman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 7.56% compared to L3Harris Technologies's net margin of 7.33%. L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 6.4% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.41%.

L3Harris Technologies has a consensus price target of $277.35, signalling upside risk potential of 30.6%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $135.51 which suggests that it could grow by 16.1%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than RTX, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than RTX.

L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.718, which suggesting that the stock is 28.236% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.829, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.125%.

L3Harris Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $1.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.19%. RTX offers a yield of 2.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. L3Harris Technologies pays 70.74% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 101.38% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but RTX's is not.

L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.1B. L3Harris Technologies's net income of $400M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, L3Harris Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 33.55x while RTX's PE ratio is 33.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L3Harris Technologies is 1.91x versus 1.98x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.