HII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 8.61%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $198.34, signalling downside risk potential of -3.83%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.64 which suggests that it could grow by 7.89%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.429% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.586, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.395%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.42 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.77x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 19.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 1.56x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 2.83%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $198.34, signalling downside risk potential of -3.83%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $526.94 which suggests that it could grow by 19.2%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.429% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.432, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.807%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.77x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 19.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 1.49x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Northrop Grumman has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 11.83%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat Northrop Grumman's return on equity of 28.45%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $198.34, signalling downside risk potential of -3.83%. On the other hand Northrop Grumman has an analysts' consensus of $545.35 which suggests that it could grow by 7.65%. Given that Northrop Grumman has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Northrop Grumman is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.429% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Northrop Grumman has a beta of 0.306, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.424%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. Northrop Grumman offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.06 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Northrop Grumman pays out 28.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Northrop Grumman quarterly revenues of $10.7B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than Northrop Grumman's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.77x while Northrop Grumman's PE ratio is 17.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 1.82x for Northrop Grumman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 6.85%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.72%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $198.34, signalling downside risk potential of -3.83%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $143.33 which suggests that it could grow by 5.66%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.486, which suggesting that the stock is 51.429% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.803, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.687%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.57%. RTX offers a yield of 1.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $21.6B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.77x while RTX's PE ratio is 38.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.70x versus 2.26x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.