HII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 8.13%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.96%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $218.84, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $288.39 which suggests that it could grow by 6.14%. Given that General Dynamics has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe General Dynamics is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $12.2B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $994M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.90x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 18.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.76x versus 1.53x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

L3Harris Technologies has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 8.2%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat L3Harris Technologies's return on equity of 7.9%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $218.84, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand L3Harris Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $254.81 which suggests that it could grow by 17.82%. Given that L3Harris Technologies has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe L3Harris Technologies is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison L3Harris Technologies has a beta of 0.715, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.488%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. L3Harris Technologies offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.20 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. L3Harris Technologies pays out 58.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than L3Harris Technologies quarterly revenues of $5.5B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than L3Harris Technologies's net income of $453M. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.90x while L3Harris Technologies's PE ratio is 27.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.76x versus 1.93x for L3Harris Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 9.53%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 83.28%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $218.84, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $522.49 which suggests that it could grow by 11.93%. Given that Lockheed Martin has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe Lockheed Martin is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.90x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 20.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.76x versus 1.54x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 4.1% compared to Huntington Ingalls Industries's net margin of 7.56%. Huntington Ingalls Industries's return on equity of 12.93% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a consensus price target of $218.84, signalling downside risk potential of -1.38%. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $139.24 which suggests that it could grow by 14.16%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Huntington Ingalls Industries, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Huntington Ingalls Industries.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a beta of 0.338, which suggesting that the stock is 66.211% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.604, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.573%.

Huntington Ingalls Industries has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.39%. RTX offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. Huntington Ingalls Industries pays 37.46% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntington Ingalls Industries quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Huntington Ingalls Industries's net income of $123M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Huntington Ingalls Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.90x while RTX's PE ratio is 35.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntington Ingalls Industries is 0.76x versus 2.01x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.