HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 16.01%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 18.58%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $33.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.02%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $50.32 which suggests that it could grow by 37.27%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Baker Hughes, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Baker Hughes.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.262%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 12.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.78x versus 1.32x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 16.73%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $33.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.02%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.35 which suggests that it could grow by 17.69%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 22.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.78x versus 3.79x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 11.8%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $33.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.02%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $51.98 which suggests that it could grow by 59.74%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.846%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 10.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.78x versus 1.29x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.97%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 29.27%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $33.04, signalling upside risk potential of 63.02%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $217.62 which suggests that it could grow by 33.98%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, which suggesting that the stock is 45.349% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.072%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.36%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $351M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.16x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 28.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.78x versus 2.19x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.