FTI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Baker Hughes has a net margin of 6.36% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of 6.26%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.52% beat Baker Hughes's return on equity of 17.87%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $35.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand Baker Hughes has an analysts' consensus of $46.63 which suggests that it could grow by 25.86%. Given that Baker Hughes has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe Baker Hughes is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.033% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Baker Hughes has a beta of 0.959, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.121%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Baker Hughes offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Baker Hughes pays out 28.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Baker Hughes quarterly revenues of $6.4B. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $142M is lower than Baker Hughes's net income of $402M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Baker Hughes's PE ratio is 12.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.47x versus 1.33x for Baker Hughes. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Delek Logistics Partners LP has a net margin of 6.36% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of 15.62%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.52% beat Delek Logistics Partners LP's return on equity of --.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $35.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand Delek Logistics Partners LP has an analysts' consensus of $43.00 which suggests that it could grow by 2.92%. Given that TechnipFMC PLC has higher upside potential than Delek Logistics Partners LP, analysts believe TechnipFMC PLC is more attractive than Delek Logistics Partners LP.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.033% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Delek Logistics Partners LP has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.85%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Delek Logistics Partners LP offers a yield of 10.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.11 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Delek Logistics Partners LP pays out 143.46% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Delek Logistics Partners LP's is not.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Delek Logistics Partners LP quarterly revenues of $249.9M. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $142M is higher than Delek Logistics Partners LP's net income of $39M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Delek Logistics Partners LP's PE ratio is 13.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.47x versus 2.22x for Delek Logistics Partners LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of 6.36% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of 3.77%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.52% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 20.56%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $35.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $29.12 which suggests that it could grow by 48.62%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.033% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.186, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.638%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.4B. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $142M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $204M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.47x versus 0.76x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oceaneering International has a net margin of 6.36% compared to TechnipFMC PLC's net margin of 7.47%. TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.52% beat Oceaneering International's return on equity of 26.18%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a consensus price target of $35.17, signalling upside risk potential of 12.92%. On the other hand Oceaneering International has an analysts' consensus of $20.50 which suggests that it could grow by 7.5%. Given that TechnipFMC PLC has higher upside potential than Oceaneering International, analysts believe TechnipFMC PLC is more attractive than Oceaneering International.

TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.020, which suggesting that the stock is 2.033% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oceaneering International has a beta of 1.538, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.803%.

TechnipFMC PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.64%. Oceaneering International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. TechnipFMC PLC pays 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Oceaneering International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are larger than Oceaneering International quarterly revenues of $674.5M. TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $142M is higher than Oceaneering International's net income of $50.4M. Notably, TechnipFMC PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.39x while Oceaneering International's PE ratio is 10.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for TechnipFMC PLC is 1.47x versus 0.71x for Oceaneering International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.